SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Amazon.com, Inc. (AMZN) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Sarmad Y. Hermiz who wrote (50911)4/16/1999 4:16:00 PM
From: Rob S.  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 164684
 
I heard a rumor that Amazon is preparing to split the stock either 3:1 or 5:1 after earnings are released. If so, there is a good chance something will be announced at the time of earnings.



To: Sarmad Y. Hermiz who wrote (50911)4/16/1999 4:17:00 PM
From: Jan Crawley  Respond to of 164684
 
I hope we don't regret throwing caution to the wind like that.

But Sarmad, looking at our portfolios now, for the past month or so, we have realized $$$ and have gained experience(the close encounter of the Amzn kind). So i think that 200 is OK now. <gggg>

Anyway, have a nice weekend!!!



To: Sarmad Y. Hermiz who wrote (50911)4/16/1999 4:18:00 PM
From: Glenn D. Rudolph  Respond to of 164684
 
Next "Melissa" virus could be worse, experts warn

Next "Melissa" virus could be worse, experts warn
By Aaron Pressman
WASHINGTON, April 15 (Reuters) - Computer experts and FBI
cybersleuths on Thursday warned Congress that the next
widespread software virus could do a lot more damage than the
recent Melissa bug.
"Melissa is another warning siren of the vulnerability of
our networks," Richard Pethia, director the Computer Emergency
Response Team at Carnegie Mellon University, told a House
Science subcommittee hearing.
"Future mutations, or entire new strains, could easily be
much harder to detect, spread even more quickly and cause
significantly more damage," Pethia warned.
The Melissa virus, which spread itself over the Internet
inside of Microsoft Word documents to thousands of computer
users, did little damage other than clogging e-mail servers and
forcing some companies to shut down computers for a short time.
Previous viruses and related computer bugs that spread by
more conventional means have erased data, allowed outsiders
access to secure computers and even purloined information and
sent it to unauthorized recipients.
Michael Vatis, head of the FBI's National Infrastructure
Protection Center, said damage from Melissa was "significantly
contained" thanks to warnings from law enforcers and the media
that spread almost as fast as the virus itself.
Melissa "serves as a wake up call for both government and
the private sector regarding the threat from malicious viruses
being spread over the Internet," Vatis said.
Vatis declined to discuss how law enforcement agencies
including the FBI quickly apprehended a suspect in the Melissa
case, but thanked America Online <AOL.N> for cooperating with
the investigation. The suspect, David Smith, is alleged to have
spread the virus using a stolen AOL account.
Some lawmakers on the panel voiced concerns that privacy
rights had been violated in an effort to track down the Melissa
virus author.
"I think we have to be careful," said New York Democrat
Anthony Weiner. "What we wind up doing very often with these
new technologies, the new crime of the moment, the frenzy of
the moment, is we lurch forward with sometimes excessive
responses."
Vatis said that in collecting information during the
Melissa investigation, the FBI had obtained permission from a
court when required by law. In some instances, owners of
information or computer systems turned over information
voluntarily.
"We have very clear procedures that we must follow to
gather information in order to trace back a virus to its
originating source or a hacker," Vatis said.



To: Sarmad Y. Hermiz who wrote (50911)4/16/1999 4:57:00 PM
From: Jan Crawley  Respond to of 164684
 
I see that you are playing 200 shares at a time now also. I hope we don't regret

Sarmad, i need to clarify it; for Amzn, i "bought to close" 200 shares first at 186 1/2 and then sold the 200 long shares later. So my box is gone and zero position right now. Actually, i got the idea after your post to me. Now, i have 6 Intc Apr. 57 1/2 puts and i am not sure if those shares will be assigned to me, Intc closed at 57 1/2.