SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : BEST INTERNET STOCKS TO OWN IN 1999 -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: JOHN CHEN who wrote (313)4/16/1999 9:50:00 PM
From: Catcher  Respond to of 471
 
john, good insight into amzn & other on-line retailers.

any thoughts on amtd (ameritrade) or other on-line stock
brokers. i like this sector for the following

info from sites like si helps average guy understand
stocks better & if you focus on a particular sector
(eg tech) you can operate without input from alleged
experts (brokers) alternate style is to invest in
narrow band of gorillas (eg msft, intc)

i think the brokerage business will be one of the first
industries to be revolutionalized by web. the transaction
is so simple & there is no follow up service work required.

i don't know anyone who now trades for $8.00 who will
one day begin trading for $45 again.

any thoughts on amtd...anyone



To: JOHN CHEN who wrote (313)4/16/1999 9:54:00 PM
From: puborectalis  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 471
 
That's why eBay looks better to me every day...war-chest of money now that 1.1B financing is done.Auctions will go from person-to-person to business-to-person.



To: JOHN CHEN who wrote (313)4/17/1999 2:31:00 PM
From: Jing Qian  Respond to of 471
 
John, I respectfully disagree. DELL may not go through AMZN to sell their PCs, but mid to small businesses are happy to use Amazon to sell because AMZN serves as an aggregator of consumer traffic. For XYZ Inc., it's way cheaper to sell on AMZN than build a XYZ.com to sell. AMZN already invested 10s of millions to amass such a big pool of customers. XYZ company can't afford to do that. So they will go to AMZN to sell, either directly or through fixed price auction. Direct business to consumer sales can only be a reality for big companies like DELL, MSFT and INTC. For smaller companies such as all the book publishers, toy makers, drug makers, furniture makers, CD distributors, they have to find a customer aggregator to sell quickly instead of wasting 10s of millions to build and maintain their own web sites. And after spending 10s of millions of advertisements and web design, XYZ.com still can't beat Amazon.com for its brand name and popularity. Why would XYZ Inc run such a risk? XYZ inc could spend only a fraction of that money to sell on Amazon.com quickly. Therefore, for XYZ Inc., cutting out middle man, Amazon.com to sell their own products directly could mean no sales at all due to lack of user traffic. User traffic is the KEY.

I feel it would be your biggest oversight ever by not investing in AMZN, EBAY and YHOO. You will see that in 2005.



To: JOHN CHEN who wrote (313)4/17/1999 3:59:00 PM
From: Jing Qian  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 471
 
John, please read this and see what you think about AMZN:
fool.com



To: JOHN CHEN who wrote (313)6/1/1999 4:09:00 PM
From: JOHN CHEN  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 471
 
On 4/16, message #313, almost a month and half ago, I used the word "middlemen" to describe AMZN, and gave my reasons why AMZN is over-valued.

This past weekend, Barron's article said exactly what I have said a month and half ago. Someone from Barron's must have read my opinions and use it in his article.