SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: RDM who wrote (55771)4/17/1999 1:31:00 AM
From: Process Boy  Respond to of 1579296
 
RDM - <First of all, going to a smaller fabrication process is a difficult task some delays will more than likely prevent the Coppermine-600 from competing with the K7>

RDM, Coppermine will not be te first product out on .18. A 400MHz Mobile Pentium II with on die L2 cache should be out sometime this quarter, according to several Intel Execs that have spoken in public recently. This suggests a viable .18 process is already in place. I believe Coppermine is scheduled for sometime in Q3, according to Intel guidance, with no announced slips. I'd advise this fellow to revisit this portion of his analysis.

I do agree going to a smaller feature size process does take some work :-))

PB



To: RDM who wrote (55771)4/17/1999 10:09:00 AM
From: Jim McMannis  Respond to of 1579296
 
RDM,
RE:"Don't forget that the
die-size increases from the K6-2 to K6-3 with 135-81= +/- 54 mm² and
an extra 256 L2-cache won't do much."

I believe the author is mistaken about the K6-III die size. I think it's 118mm2.



To: RDM who wrote (55771)4/17/1999 10:45:00 AM
From: Elmer  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1579296
 
Re: "K7 vs Coppermine. Here's where the real fireworks begin!"

RDM, that was the most ill informed speculation I have seen in a long time.

EP