Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Kosovo -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: DeplorableIrredeemableRedneck who wrote (4226)	4/18/1999 11:44:00 AM
From: Stormweaver	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 17770

Nice response, you should be a poet, but you failed to site anything concrete. The U.N. should have lead this since they are a political organization that is adept at resolving these kinds of issues through negotiation. The U.N. doctrines are our only significant foundation for international law and we are in facting "flushing" them in favor of what NATO justifies is correct. NATO is exceeding it's definitions by being involved. In essence NATO was/should be just a "treaty" between a group of nations that pledge allegiance to defend each other should THERE borders be incurred upon. Not jumping into internal skirmishes and in effect becoming the new global cops. p.s. the cold war isn't over. It was on it's way to being over, through economic integration with Russia, but this little fiasco has set us back greatly.