Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Global Thermoelectric - SOFC Fuel cells (GLE:TSE) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: John Paquet who wrote (606)	4/17/1999 2:47:00 PM
From: the Chief	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 6016

Patience and intelligence will pay off in the long run. So what your saying is you are destined to lose bigtime then! You have arrived.....so I leave!! Bye! the Chief

To: John Paquet who wrote (606)	4/17/1999 3:05:00 PM
From: Ronald	Respond to of 6016

I disagree with you John. I think this is just the begining and we will see much higher prices on Monday.

To: John Paquet who wrote (606)	4/17/1999 3:45:00 PM
From: keith massey	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 6016

but short term [depending how long is short term }is very bearish I would tend to disagree with this statement. The insiders hold 38% of the stock and the warrents are not free trading yet. This gives us a free float of 10 million shares. 7.2 million shares trades hands yesterday or 72% of the free float all at prices higher than $9 and a big chunk of them above $11. When the general retail public gets this news this weekend they are going to want in. Who is going to sell them shares? The insiders would be shoot in the street if they dumped now and there are no cheap shares from warrents. I am not letting any of my shares go for under $15-17 and I am fairly sure a lot of people holding feel the same way. We will find out who is right on Monday. Best Regards KEITH

To: John Paquet who wrote (606)	4/17/1999 4:03:00 PM
From: marcos	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 6016

A surprising if somewhat pseudo- affectation of intelligence for the 'John Paquet' login - no fake French accent this time, a complete and welcome absence of YAHOOHOHAHOOOEY!!!s, and no pumping of Cart-away asswipe this time, thank the Lord Harry. Interesting to note the 'development' of this poster, through cwa - #reply-4140909 and dml - #reply-6255943 + #reply-6306854 and wsp - #reply-7700676 + #reply-7711012 Has his own thread - #Subject-24130 Nominated to Thread Morons #reply-7949934 The Chief's attitude came for good reason - #reply-6717265 Same with Walt's - #reply-7821653 Same with mine - #reply-7759689 Still with the "I shall ... buy my 250,000 shares to start with" bullshit. Well, that's the price we pay for freedom of speech i guess, we have to wade though this garbage to get to the rest.

To: John Paquet who wrote (606)	4/18/1999 12:34:00 AM
From: Buckey	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 6016

jp - - Lets see what monday brings - That technical chart shit ainty goon fit here - No model for this buy 250,000 shares - PLEEZEE -

To: John Paquet who wrote (606)	4/18/1999 2:17:00 PM
From: John Paquet	Read Replies (4) \| Respond to of 6016

Again, This is an "invention", "innovation", "tech-" stocks. I am glad to see so many threaders who are feel interesting in this stocks plus on going company development. Some are absolutely bullish, some are bit neutral, some are awaiting. As they said "bulls can make money, bear can also make money, only pig never can." What you mean "pig ?"" Mr. John Paquet???? Pig by the definition here is some one out in the world still did not smell GLE.T stock. Now let go back to our major interests in playing this stock, I mean play it imply buying for the long side-investing, or sell for the short side. I heard lots argument regrading their longs, 2 power 1/2 size, lots of good stuff of the company since 1997, confirmation talks with insiders, and reconfimation back into this thread, and some threader reconfirmation of the conffirmation. Some threader even had gone all the way attacking those who holds different views of points. It is alway very interesting that happening in this SI talks, and I, Mr. John Paquet has no surprise at all. Now this is again, my points of views: 1.There are more 500 companies which are work their ass to produce that "invention", "innovattion" "the tech-stuff" in order to compete and lead in this filed. I hope that GLE.T will be the leader, besides that BLD.T. 2. Some one listed a bunch good stuff, the price of GLE.T still hanging belowthat $3.00 for long time under last Friday, when WTs. expired. 3. In the NR, the words , "Global intends to negotiagte an agreement with covering the entire solid feul cell project>" , "indends" and " negotiate" are non-exsitential, it is not exsitential, it is not there yet, or else, NR will use the words' Completed an agreement" do not have to nagotiate stuff. 4. In the NR "While the parties believe that these nagotiations will reach a successful conclusion, there is no assurance that such will be the case." These words are disclaimaer of this NR in order to protect the NR integrity, in case latter on in the near future that nagotiations did not materialize then what ?????? the accuracy of this NR then is well-protacted. you see. 5. The first IPO may be $1000, to $100,000 as an experiment, or trrail and errors stuff. Who knows how many companyies Dephi could have tried and errored ???? 6. The value of the ist IPO of transactions has not been disclosed. It made wionder how successful this gonna to be???? 7. There many big "ifs" in this play, I shall be very cautious, some insiders did even think that $1.50 is fair price at the movement of his comments etc..... 8. I think I could have my 250,000 shares filled with a pices of cake, there is no sweat at all, and any be I could get it filled in that $3.00 to 4.00 ranges. This Friday rally is an one day NR event, in conjunction that Wt.s expired stuff. 9. Threaders are nearly 99% bullkish, 1% bearich, as " constrain theory: works most of the time, other wise, majority of the market players would make descent living by playing stocks. but this is non-exsitential, also. Majority are losing money in this stock market. Yahohohohohoohohohoho!!! John Paquet Again, only patience and intelligence will pay off in the long run.