Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Don't Ask Rambi -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Rambi who wrote (22291)	4/18/1999 12:27:00 PM
From: E	Respond to of 71178

About the contest: I want to remind everyone that the occasion of the original contest was Blue's mention of an article she had seen in a COSMO magazine in which the male g spot was featured. She even proposed that she might go to the library and try to find the old issue that identified, for Cosmo readers, that spot. I want also to point out that the constituency of Cosmo is not identical to that of a gay male magazine, and a certain locus that never sees the light of day is highly unlikely to be one to which Cosmo commends the attention of its readers. There is an external locus from which the place that never sees the light of day is indirectly accessible, and that would not be an entirely wrongheaded entry in the contest. It shouldn't win, but at least it could have been considered by the editors of COSMO to be of possible interest to their readers. It might well be referred to as "the second g spot." In fact, I might even be able to produce an article I got off the net (after I had submitted my entry, I hasten to say) (an article which I have supplied to our revered judge) in which it is referred to as that. If I don't get my way I am going to demand the Cosmo article be produced. I am going to demand a recount. I am going to scour the TOS for a violation to report. I remain, as ever, yours truly, E. P.S. I don't know about Bill Ulrich's photo page. Could someone explain that to me, or give a link?

To: Rambi who wrote (22291)	4/18/1999 2:07:00 PM
From: Gauguin	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 71178

THEORY: Have you noticed jokes are tinged with nervous irreverent spookiness on Sundays? Just because it's Sunday? "Better not say that! Well ~ wait til Monday. It will be less irreverent. But not reverent, but.....it will be funny then. Well, it's funny, but we can't laugh. Now." God doesn't like tummy-twirlers. I don't think you can tell risque jokes after Church. Well, at least wait til you get to the car and everyone has been distracted, by something like a visit to McDonalds. I have a theory, that just a ton (that's my number in the theory) of married sex takes place (that's the same as happens) after church. What do you bet. What do you think. Know. I don't go to church, so I can't know. But we're talking aggregate population anyway. Maybe, for simplicity, limiting this to church-goers. Points to account: ~ Mom and dad have to change their clothes; that means like carefully slink off the ones they're wearing and dabble long enough to get the damn things oops back on hangers; ~ Mom, looks really, really good; especially in those stockings with the little flowers on the seams; ~ All those other pastel chickadees at church kept me awake; thank goodness; ~ You look dee-licious, Hon; ~ I'm not tired!! ~ What other chance are we going to get?; ~ "I've been good." ~ The kids would never dream we're in here doing anything but changing our clothes; heck it's Sunday; ~ Perfume? ~ This slip makes me growl; ~ I love when you put your foot up on the bed; ~ Those are my favorites! ~ I'll be hungry enough for pancakes afterwards; ~ I'm gonna run and get the syrup! (I'm into science instead of religion.)