Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Let's Talk About Our Feelings!!! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Jacques Chitte who wrote (35170)	4/18/1999 2:17:00 PM
From: E	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 108807

Yes, it's clear. In fact, the force is much more important than the sex, because it is criminal and hurts people, possibly ruining their whole lives. 'Force' is what makes it rape. But that was't the issue.The issue was that many here were taking the absurd position that rape was not a sexual act. Just that. That is all I am trying to debunk. Because it is bunk. That is why I drew up my scenario. I just want everyone who agrees that that rape scenario is one that happens, is, for the rapist (not for his horrified victim) sexual act. Want to sign on to that statement? I want Edwarda to sign on too. Then I will be happy. We can then either drop it or discuss other more complex or subtle rape scenarios. But first let's get everybody to vote on that one. Sexual or not for the rapist, Lather.