SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Global Thermoelectric - SOFC Fuel cells (GLE:TSE) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: keith massey who wrote (724)4/18/1999 3:29:00 PM
From: LABMAN  Respond to of 6016
 
US govt tightens Emission standards...

Home - Yahoo! - Help

[ Business | US Market | By Industry | IPO | AP | S&P | International | PRNews | BizWire ]

Sunday April 18, 2:45 pm Eastern Time

New gov't rules set for cleaner
gasoline, vehicles

By Tom Doggett

WASHINGTON, April 18 (Reuters) - The federal government
will propose rules, possibly as early as this week, to require oil
companies to produce cleaner gasoline with less sulfur and
automakers to build light trucks and sports-utility vehicles that have
the same emissions standards as cars.

The new requirements from the Environmental Protection Agency would be equivalent to removing
54 million polluting cars from the road.

While the result would be cleaner air, the rules could also increase the price for gasoline, the popular
pickup trucks and SUVs -- which now account for half of U.S. vehicle sales.

The stronger standards are the result of an EPA study last year that concluded 84 million Americans
would continue to breathe unhealthy air unless cars and light trucks became cleaner.

It marks the first time the nation's emission rules would be substantially strengthened since the 1990
Clean Air Act.

The rules are still being fine-tuned by an interagency group, including the Office of Management and
Budget, which is expected to finish its work this week, according to sources familiar with the
proposal.

The rules would allow the new emission and cleaner gasoline standards to be phased in over several
years beginning in 2004, the sources said.

Specifically, the sulfur in gasoline, which nationally now averages 340 parts per million (PPM),
would have to be reduced to about a tenth of current levels, possibly as little as 30 PPM.

At the same time, pickup trucks and SUVs will have to reduce their emissions of nitrogen oxides --
a key ingredient in smog. The biggest and most polluting SUVs will not have to fully comply with the
new standards until 2009.

Automobile manufacturers have urged the EPA to lower the sulfur content in gasoline, arguing the
catalytic converters in auto engines would run better.

On the other hand, oil companies contend they would be stuck with the bills to upgrade their
refineries to produce the cleaner gasoline, which would raise motor fuel costs.

The EPA agreed, saying in an agency staff paper last year: ''Significant sulfur reduction would likely
require investment in new refinery equipment and increases in operating costs.''

The new requirements could raise gasoline prices 5 cents to 8 cents a gallon with current refining
technology, while promising new technology could reduce the costs to just 2 cents a gallon, the
agency said.

Smaller refiners would have more time to convert their operations to produce the cleaner gasoline,
under the federal standards.

Oil companies have proposed that gasolines with different levels of sulfur be allowed in certain
regions of the country. For example, gasoline with lower sulfur would be marketed in the
more-polluted eastern U.S., while motor fuel with more sulfur would be sold in western states.

However, environmental groups argue some vehicles could travel out of a region and then return
with more polluting gasoline.

Once EPA issues its rules, the proposal will be open to public comment and then possibly modified
before the final guidelines take effect.

Related News Categories: automobiles, oil/energy, US Market News

Help

Copyright © 1999 Reuters Limited. All rights reserved. Republication or redistribution of Reuters content is
expressly prohibited without the prior written consent of Reuters. Reuters shall not be liable for any errors or
delays in the content, or for any actions taken in reliance thereon.
See our Important Disclaimers and Legal Information.
Questions or Comments?

lm