SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Let's Talk About Our Feelings!!! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Grainne who wrote (35194)4/18/1999 7:09:00 PM
From: Jacques Chitte  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 108807
 
>I guess I would also maintain that very potent marijuana, and especially hashish, are mild hallucinogens, but not
from recent experience, of course!<

lol! Is that, uhm, pizza?

>this program about the mummies used this to expand on the idea that it was
entirely reasonable that the Egyptians used South American cocaine. So I don't believe it is an airtight
argument to argue that strong hallucinogens didn't grow in Palestine.<

Hey! I saw the same program! Right - cocaine mummies. If I remember, the presence of cocaine in the tissue was not universally accepted! (sloppy grad students laaaate at night - gotta stay awake - lol) So the whole thing is, if you'll excuse my judgment, fringe science.
In any case, i wasn't trying to construct an airtight argument that Jesus had no access to hallucinogens. Rather, I was counseling caution and perhaps a retreat from the subjective assertion that the area was swimming in good s***. I would be interested to know if the Jews and neighbors of the era had a drug culture. This falls in the purview of the ethnopharmacologists and their anthropologist colleagues, and I confess I'm too poorly read in the area to be a good target for informed debate :-)