Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : SHAL -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: CASINO1 who wrote (282)	4/18/1999 11:11:00 PM
From: trader14U	Respond to of 941

Yeah, that's what I'm afraid of, legal action. I am saying on the freakin record I know of specific insider selling through Canada. Which house and who!!! So shove that somewhere. Yeah right, I should give you the proof and expose my contacts. Maybe if you weren't such a dope you could tell by the tone of my post that I'm serious!! Let the company sue me for slander, I freakin dare them!! They won't because they know what I'm saying is true!! So stop being a pea brain and wake up. Do you think I would expose myself to that sort of legal trouble if what I was saying wasn't true? I can't wait to see how you respond to this!!!!

To: CASINO1 who wrote (282)	4/18/1999 11:14:00 PM
From: trader14U	Respond to of 941

And as for direct statements against shal which you dare me to make, I believe my previous post covers that. But in case you are dumber than I thought, Shal insiders have sold stock and are selling stock through Canada!! Is that direct enough for you??????????

To: CASINO1 who wrote (282)	4/19/1999 12:05:00 AM
From: Scott Bergquist	Respond to of 941

Interesting how the insider at PAIR tried to foment a price rise by creating a story that the company was being acquired. Totally fictitious, and he is now fired/in litigation (so I have read, did not witness this firsthand.) You know, plenty of people had named names with Amazon, Bezos and his analyst buddies, accused them on these boards of far more that "selling shares in Canada". Didn't see any lawsuits. ABTX, on the other hand, resulted in suits against short-sellers trying to drive the stock down. If you are "afraid" of litigation I suggest you just stay off these "boards" altogether. Just because you use an alias is no protection (Yahoo! just agreed to reveal names for litigation). Your only protection -when- there is litigation is the truth of your allegations. Old law school saying: "Even the Bishop of Boston can be sued for bastardy".. <<you cannot -prevent- being in litigation, you can only reduce the likelihood. You should just leave the "public arena" if this is a real concern of yours..I doubt that you really are afraid, but it is convenient to say so. ================================================================ As jj stated, Krause being in both Janus and Sara Hallitex is troubling: you have to have a lot of ego to think spreading yourself in two places is the best thing for -both- companies. I note that it is stated that he is "temporary" with Janus.. is Jobs "temporary" with Apple?? There are few Steven Jobs around; until I speak with Krause and hear his version of it, and when he is "unwinding" from Janus I won't be happy with that aspect of SHAL's business. ============================================================== I see ELOT focusing on "core lottery business". Could spell trouble for shorts there...