Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : SOUTHERNERA (t.SUF) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Confluence who wrote (3011)	4/19/1999 8:43:00 AM
From: Brian MacDonald	Respond to of 7235

Is that a 'real' bid this morning on SUF? Do I see $6.50? Brian

To: Confluence who wrote (3011)	4/19/1999 9:25:00 AM
From: gemsearcher	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 7235

Hello Confluence. Every analyst report that I have seen (FM , TD , Merrill , NB and BOE) all have pointed to cash flow concerns post - M1 ; i.e. the need for SUF to bring another mine into production to complement production from the Klipspringer fissures. The Messina deal addresses that concern in spades (I was - and still am - betting on another find at Marsfontein so this deal is an incredible bonus). I do however have some concern that the domestic market may not fully appreciate this in terms of the share price in the absence of a strike in the NWT - i.e. the analysts may be bullish but the buyers aren't there ; in that eventuality a foreign listing will almost become a necessity. I seem to recall a previous poster noting that the JSE does not permit dual listings , or at least requires that the primary listing be the JSE? You DO remember Berton! As for the Great One , yes , yesterday was a sad day. Regards. gemsearcher