SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Clinton's Scandals: Is this corruption the worst ever? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Catfish who wrote (12204)4/19/1999 12:40:00 PM
From: Liatris Spicata  Respond to of 13994
 
HaHaHa Darrell-

Slick slipped through your trap again! You guys have been out-maneouvered by a small town scamster once more. We the People have spoken, and a President of the United States who lies to a federal court is fine with us (as long as we "likes" the president. But if your stand on "women's issues" is not to our liking, don't even think you could get away with it). Along the way, we are going to merrily trash the people who have tried to expose the little sleazebag for exactly what he is. We will disparage their motives- something about which we know nothing, but, hey, it makes good copy- and the dopes who infest the voting booths of the USA will go along. We will issue indignant complaints about the money it takes to conduct an investigation, as if we could place a price on justice toward the highest levels of government. And thanks to the dopes who constitute the American voting public, we will win. Hahahaha!!

History will leave William Jefferson Clinton exposed as the crooked little sleazebag he is. Do you think the dopes care about history? Do they even know it exists??

Larry

P.S. Will the nation "survive" Clinton? Certainly. Does such a nation have the will or leadership ability to constructively lead the world in the 21st century? Doubtful, IMO. But We the People have our bellies full and our portfolios at record highs, so we care not a scintilla for the lessons of history or for the legacy we bequeath the future. Contrast our attitude with that of Plains Indians. When the tribal leaders had an important decision to make, I understand they tried to evaluate its impact for seven generations.



To: Catfish who wrote (12204)4/21/1999 4:43:00 AM
From: Andrew Martin  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 13994
 
The greater purpose of NATO's war on Yugoslavia:

worldnetdaily.com

I knew about the Azerbaijani connections with NATO but always assumed it was related to the Caspian sea oil reserves. I guess I'm not thinking big enough.