Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Barrick Gold (ABX) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: mineman who wrote (1170)	4/19/1999 12:34:00 PM
From: Enigma	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 3558

" Barrick have sold forward gold from their other projects but not this one, which would be sold forward at about $283/oz." 1. How do you know this? Also a forward sale would be at a higher price than $283 - by definition. 2. Why should I ask Barrick any questions? You're raising them, why don't you ask them? I'm not presently a shareholder or short for that matter. 3. I've drawn your posts to the attention of Barrick - I only mention this to you because you have said things which strike me as very close to being slanderous. They have looked at what you've said - whether they continue to do so is up to them - they may consider it quite harmless, who knows? dd

To: mineman who wrote (1170)	4/19/1999 8:34:00 PM
From: salva	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 3558

Your're back mineman!! How did you make out with cybersurf? Look you really like to spend a lot of energy here on you allegations that Barrick screwed up on Sutton {{{Investors deserve a full accounting of this project but management are not releasing any information! Why?}}}} Why dont YOU go ask Barrick? If you are so concerned, and you are an investor of Barrick-why dont you go ask them to answer your questions. If YOU feel cheated-hire a lawyer and go see Barrick!! By the way if you are so sure that Gold is going < $280 why not go short gold - you must be good at shorting?