SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech : Iomega Thread without Iomega -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: David Colvin who wrote (9258)4/20/1999 11:01:00 AM
From: David Colvin  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 10072
 
I own Intel and just got their 1998 annual report in the mail. Just
for fun, I plugged Intel's 1997 performance numbers into my spreadsheet
to see, percentage wise, how they compare to Iomega in areas like SG&A,
R&D, net profits, etc. Here are both company's numbers side by side:

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Iomega Intel
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1997 1997
Revenue $ (m) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,740.0 25,070.0
Gross Margin $ (m) . . . . . . . . . . . . . 547.7 10,659.0
Gross Margin % . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31.5% 42.5%
SG&A $ (m) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 291.9 2,891.0
SG&A %. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16.8% 11.5%
R&D $ (m). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 78.0 2,347.0
R&D % . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4.5% 9.4%
Net Operating Margin $ (m). . . . . . . . . . . 118.0 6,945.0
Net Operating Margin % . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6.8% 27.7%
Net Operating EPS $ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0.42 1.93
Special Charges $ (m) . . . . . . . . . . . . . (2.7) 0.0
Special Charges EPS. . . . . . . . . . . . . . (0.01) 0.00
Post-Charge Net Margin %. . . . . . . . . . . . 6.6% 27.7%
Post-Charge EPS $. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0.41 1.93

Act Diluted Shares (m) . . . . . . . . . . . . . 282.4 3,590.0

I know, I know, different companies, different market segments! I
still think the comparison's are interesting . For example look at
how small Intel's percentage of revenues is for SG&A. On the other
hand, look at how large a percentage Intel spends on R&D. Also,
look at the huge net margins for Intel....in a market segment
where they literally dominate the business (like Iomega does). Maybe
these percentages for Iomega are perfectly normal for their type
of business while Intel's percentages are also perfectly normal for
their type of business, who knows?

Any accountants or other business guru's out there have any thoughts
about what is "normal" and what is "unusual" for different types of
market segments? One example I can think of is grocery stores....they
operate on extremely thin profit margins (like maybe 3%) and depend
on large sales volumes for reasonable profitability.

Dave