To: stock bull who wrote (118743 ) 4/19/1999 1:20:00 PM From: edamo Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 176387
sb..<ot> that is where we disagree...in essence, anything that is bought and sold can be deemed by definition a "commodity"....but if the buyer has freedom of choice to customize his purchase than it's not a "pure commodity"...to me commodity is that which if you close your eyes, all producers offering look, feel, smell, and perform the "exact" same function and purpose....if you apply the same logic to white boxes..than aren't mainframes and servers also commodities?... direct sale with bto negates "guessing" of market...nothing ever becomes stale...able to change with the market requirement...direct sale with "standard" inventory, next best...but still at risk, depending on inventory level and mix...indirect sale can also use bto approach...just an extension to manufacturer sales force...indirect sale with owned or consigned inventory only works for true commodity for which there exists no possible variations or configurations, or has capability of being modified at the indirect seller level at an added modification cost...problem i see in pc market is that indirect sales mentality is not done thru exclusive franchise...sell many brands side by side and the distributor/dealer/retailer will move what he needs at whatever price required to do so...inventory costs money at any level proprietary nature of a product has no bearing on defining a commodity...patent protection also not applicable...intel has a proprietary product and patent protection in p3....if you want p3, can only get from intc...so is it considered a commodity???..it meets your requirements!...i think the "misnomer" is causing many to become shaky of the future of tech sector...it's become a "buzz word" used by many who fail to understand what a real commodity is and how it is brought to market...when i start seeing "computer futures" trading in the pit, i might agree.....good luck, ed a.