Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Stock Attack -- A Complete Analysis -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: dennis michael patterson who wrote (20511)	4/19/1999 2:46:00 PM
From: Challo Jeregy	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 42787

I'm not wweeeeaaakkk. Keep repeating . . . I'm not wweeeeaaakkk. I'm not wweeeeaaakkk. I'm not wweeeeaaakkk. I'm not wweeeeaaakkk. I'm not . . .

To: dennis michael patterson who wrote (20511)	4/19/1999 4:07:00 PM
From: Robert Graham	Respond to of 42787

Flushing out the weak. I do not think so, Dennis. I heard this same statement during the two day sell off which by the way happened in the recent past which the NASDAQ never recovered from. In a friendly way I would like to say that I think I see here a person wed to their position. EMC doing well? This went under. Went from approximately 130 to 100 inside of 4 days and now recently broke down through a congestion area. Do you now see the pattern out of the techs which includes the NASDAQ market itself? This is where the money is coming from for the cyclicals and other sectors in a move to value. Ground Zero looks to be on the money with this call. I have a verbose post coming out soon. Watch out. ;) Bob Graham