Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : AUTOHOME, Inc -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Daskin who wrote (8256)	4/19/1999 10:16:00 PM
From: GraceZ	Respond to of 29970

My dog (all last year) Global Fund sure picked up in the last few weeks. >i think those might be going to Asia. I agree! Just last week about 200 retirement fund managers have a organized tour to Asia. I knew this, unfortunately I didn't associate this action with the money that flowing out of US Internet stocks

To: Daskin who wrote (8256)	4/19/1999 10:52:00 PM
From: Ahda	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 29970

The credit goes to E. Graphs and Ahhaha I had not seen the pick up in Asia he found it our funds going over i was to consumed with Japan itself pondering how they could make it with the depressed attitude of the public . The answer lies in the funds . It will create inflation here.

To: Daskin who wrote (8256)	4/20/1999 7:25:00 AM
From: Frank A. Coluccio	Respond to of 29970

I wonder about this. For long term, ATHM is still intact because it is next generation Internet ISP. Is ATHM, and other late blooming sparklers of the 'net like them, going to be the next generation ISPs, as you say, or are they going to be the last klinging vestige of what we now consider to be the next gen? I've been following, sometimes closely, a discussion among NANOG operators that centers on the future of ISPs. NANOG stands for North American Network Operator's Group, a functioning cooperative of ISP, IXP and backbone providers who provide one another with information relating to outages, preparedness for changes to DNS, and other esoterica needed for the Internet to function daily. The particular thread on their mailing list that is relevant here is titled "The Future of NAPs and IXPs." It not only concerns the national access points and Internet exchange points, but gets into the very core of ISPs' businesses of all sizes and tiers, especially with regard to how each of these is now regarding each other, as reflected by new conflicts which are showing up in the way they peer with one another, or not... I should like to do a roll-up of that discussion when I get some time and post it here. It should make for some interesting discourse. Unless, of course, this is deemed to be too off topic and irrevelant...