Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Let's Talk About Our Feelings!!! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Grainne who wrote (35456)	4/20/1999
From: Jacques Chitte	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 108807

>So what are you saying? You have refuted all of my hypotheses because you just say so, but not logically or factually?< Huh?! Simply this. Your hypothesis (or more properly that of the program's producers) lays out that it could be so. That is a far cry from it being so. I do not refute categorically that it could be. But the suggestive evidence proffered is nowhere near good enough for it to be considered established. There is a huge territory between yu-huh and <nuh-uh! <gg> I'm saying - let's not invoke either extreme without solid support! I am not refuting that it's possible. But I don't think it's a safe step to equate that possibility with the certainty implied in "that's how it was".