SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : 3Com Corporation (COMS) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Al Cano who wrote (29811)4/20/1999 8:32:00 AM
From: Moonray  Respond to of 45548
 
Intel plans to make networking microprocessors

PALO ALTO, Calif., April 19 (Reuters) - Intel Corp. is again
turning up the heat at its nascent data-networking business.

In its latest move into the new market, the world's largest chipmaker
announced plans on Monday to develop a microprocessor designed
for the gear that shunts data back and forth on computer networks.

The so-called network microprocessor -- typically thought of as the
brains of personal computers -- could let companies such as Cisco
Systems Inc., Northern Telecom Ltd. and Lucent Technologies Inc.
introduce products far faster than before.

It also would let them upgrade the equipment that directs network
and Internet traffic easier and cheaper.

"This would allow for networking manufacturers to implement new
upgrades without totally redesigning the chip(s)" that are in data
networking equipment, said Mike Wolf, an analyst at Cahners
In-Stat Group, based in Scottsdale, Arizona.

Most data networking gear, such as routers and switches, currently
use a type of semiconductor called an ASIC, or application-specific
integrated circuit. Instructions for ASICs are hard-wired directly
into the chip and can't be changed. But with a processor,
networking companies could simply reprogram them with new
software instructions, Intel said.

While Santa Clara, California-based Intel already makes a chip used
in printers and routers, it does not yet have an offering that would
let networking companies link the functions of the myriad ASIC
chips now used in each product. The process of designing a new
chip takes 12 to 18 months, analysts noted.

Analysts and industry sources expect the network processor to use
the StrongArm chip, which Intel acquired from Digital Equipment
Corp. about a year ago. They said the StrongArm makes sense
because of its low power consumption and simple design.

The analysts said the potential market for the processor is large
because of the demand for gear that links networks and routs vast
amounts of voice, data and video from one end of the world to the
other.

"There's a class of processor out there now where they don't have a
solution and companies are throwing tens of billions of dollars at
this market," said Richard Doherty, director of research for Seaford,
New York-based market research firm Envisioneering.

Intel's networking business is expected to be a central focus of its
twice-yearly analyst meeting in New York on Thursday. Intel
executives have said selling networking and communications gear
will be the next growth engine for the 31-year-old chipmaker.

Craig Barrett, Intel's chief executive, has already put the data
networking business on the fast track.

Mark Christensen, the 40-year-old executive in charge of the group,
is charged with boosting revenue growth in Intel's networking
business so that it outpaces its rivals by two to three times. Analysts
estimate Intel's networking business amounted to $790 million in
1998.

And the forthcoming network processor is merely the latest step in
Intel's effort to pump up revenues at the networking business to the
"multibillion" level.

"Strategically, this is a big deal for Intel," said Jim Turley of the
Microprocessor Report in Sunnyvale, California. "Networking right
now is one of the minor branches off the Intel tree, but they want it
to be a very big deal when and if the PC dies." <INTC.O>
<MOT.N> <TXN.N> <LU.N> <CSCO.O> <COMS.O>

((--Palo Alto, Calif. bureau, 650-846-5401,
duncan.martell@reuters.com))

REUTERS

Rtr 22:18 04-19-99

o~~~ O



To: Al Cano who wrote (29811)4/20/1999 9:39:00 AM
From: kech  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 45548
 
Al- Great article! QoS appears to be the factor that will determine the need for an edge focus. Maybe 3com will get its day in the sun.