Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : VALENCE TECHNOLOGY (VLNC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Bill Wexler who wrote (10559)	4/20/1999 2:08:00 PM
From: lws	Respond to of 27311

Wexler doesn't gamble??!! I always thought a bet was a gamble, and I have to think he's betting against all those insider purchases by the board members. Or are they just lying to the SEC about the purchases? I hope he will explain which it is...they lie or he gambles. Are there any other possibilities I've missed? Please, Bill, fill us in about this fraud! We'd sell & you'd profit. lws

To: Bill Wexler who wrote (10559)	4/20/1999 2:56:00 PM
From: mooter775	Respond to of 27311

Gee, Bill, I didn't mean to make a laughable bet with you, nor a sham wager. I normally don't bet with faceless names on the internet either, and so to lend some credence to my proposal, I was suggesting we escrow funds with an acceptable third party financial institution. Most people I think would consider that suggestion more 'reasonable' than a 'sham'. I'm of the opinion that $ 1.00 per share is ludicrous, so much that I was willing to challenge you on it, and you didn't respond except with your usual prattle. You rant like you have some real conviction, yet you don't really seem to back it up. As many have said here and elsewhere, the stock will find its natural level. Good luck with your short position - may you short as many shares as I own and then some.