SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Compaq -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Elwood P. Dowd who wrote (58969)4/20/1999 5:36:00 PM
From: Night Writer  Respond to of 97611
 
El,
I think what we discussed about quality of earnings is out the window. New Management is on the way. EP and EM were caught in a Catch 22 on the earnings announcement. WS was going to crucify them no matter how the earnings turned out. Now there will be a different attitude. Compaq is on WS probation and not on the $hit list is my guess.
NW



To: Elwood P. Dowd who wrote (58969)4/20/1999 5:41:00 PM
From: rupert1  Respond to of 97611
 
If the 15 cents includes tax credits the Street will basically discount the tax credits and recognise the net figure as the earnings . Last time the earnings were 43 cents but the street complained that 5 cents were credits.

It is possible that the 15 cents included tax credits, but given what EP said about the very rough figures they were using and the difficulty of computing them, how could they do such a sophisticated thing as include tax credits?

If the tax credits were not included - there are $2.9 billion of them available (but there will be conditions on their use) - I would tend to think that they may add another 5 cents, making the earnings 20 cents.

Whatever the street says about the after credits number, we should realise that tax credits are a genuine part of the earnings picture. The DEC and Tandem acquistion were costed partially on the basis of what tax credits might be available from them. Taxes not paid really do add value to the company's earnings.

The other big imponderable is whether the Brazil devaluation losses were included in the 15 cents or whether they are going to be treated as a one time charge. In his infamous leak to Credit Suisse in February the Artful Dodger (Mason) said the Brazil thing might represent $200 million or 2-3 cents a share.



To: Elwood P. Dowd who wrote (58969)4/20/1999 5:41:00 PM
From: P P Bravo  Respond to of 97611
 
El: I don't think that the earnings, a couple of cents either way, is going to make much difference at this stage (with tax considerations or not). I also believe that given the fact that everyone pointed to tax considerations last quarter, E&E would have guarded themselves from including tax considerations with the 15 cents -- why do it when they knew the stock was going to get hit hard whether they said 15 or 12?
PPB