Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Non-Tech : Western Oil and Tire Distributors (WOTD) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: campe who wrote (180)	4/20/1999 8:02:00 PM
From: Chuca Marsh	Respond to of 255

Pat Posted to RB and it is looked up with 50 new messages. All he said is ...clarrification tomorrow or the future...swas based upon a PM response that was taken out on context I gather...so...some folks are reading that 25 post back thin so much..that the "connection with the server can not be established?" So...any one who read care to PM me ot something? Curious...I see no need to post the MISS TE here,,a paraphrase in context is allways best. This is an example of watching context of everything one write - I do fear. Hang in their PR. Chuca HERE FROM PLRP who was to buy that II company: RB Threads: tarot running mouth posts here 4 times today and all of a sudden is a n expert on what our thoughts are what a rocket scientist That was the answer to this exchange: <<..By: Tarot Reply To: 1404 by tbishop Tuesday, 20 Apr 1999 at 4:29 PM EDT Post # of 1430 Caseweb?? Making acomments about investors who purchase stock based on internet chit chat and not doing DD? Hmmmm, I guess that's sorta like selling a stock and then ranting and raving on a board about getting out and trying to create panic based on another company's acquisition without even waiting to find out WHY PLRP did not acquire the company. Imagine, an investor who sells a stock based on a PR from another company. I guess all the DD about PLRP was soley based on the internet interview deal. I guess everyone at PLRP will be let go tomorrow and the company will fold now that the deal to buy some insignificant on line recruiting company fell through. Sounds like Caseweb is the pot calling the kettle black to me..... Tarot ..>> anpother : By: Tarot Reply To: 1408 by tjfataro Tuesday, 20 Apr 1999 at 4:41 PM EDT Post # of 1430 No, my friend, I am not and expert on what your thoughts are, nor do I want to be. I do however take exception to people who were hyping a stock all of a sudden bashing it and scaring away potential investors without knowing the FACTS. If you want to sell, SELL....more shares for me and believers. If ONE PR is all it takes to pry the shares out of your weak hands, then so be it. It is people like you who make it such a rough ride in the BB world. The people like ME, who believe in the product and the company, will hold onto our shares and cash in when the time is right. By the way.....did it occur to any of you to call Pacel today before bashing the stock and selling out? Didn't think so... Tarot ..>> ragingbull.com This area of that PLRP messages. Charles is my name...not Pats' SEE NEXT MESSAGE! Pat Rost is the IR at WOTD and PLRP and JNNE..that is all I know.

To: campe who wrote (180)	4/20/1999 8:08:00 PM
From: Milk	Respond to of 255

Off Topic (kinda) re: token PRs I've seen almost the same PR used for three (!!!) companies in the past: Cyberwin (CYWN), Torrey Pines Nevada (TPNN), and Netbet (NBET.) Coincidentally, Pat Charles was involved will all three... The PR looked like this: [INSERT COMPANY NAME HERE] holds a contract with one of the world's first Internet gaming and entertainment companies, Casinos of the South Pacific (COSP), to receive 80% of the net revenues from the Internet gaming and entertainment site at ck.cosp.com, located in the Cook Islands and managed by Casinos of the South Pacific. Milk