Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : WebNode.com - $4B Contract for Next Generation Internet -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Bill Ulrich who wrote (396)	4/20/1999 9:05:00 PM
From: Don Pueblo	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 588

You know, this Phyllis person and this Deborah person, whoever is the person that is making the big stink about this? I just can't figure it. It makes me think they have something to hide. Just thinking out loud.

To: Bill Ulrich who wrote (396)	4/23/1999 9:03:00 PM
From: Janice Shell	Read Replies (5) \| Respond to of 588

I'be been thinking. If B***** W* really does make good on its threat and sue, what would happen it, well, you know, like Someone made a great point of bringing up all the genuinely fradulent press releases that have been disseminated by genuinely fraudulent companies via B***** W? After all, there are a GREAT many. And as far as I know B**** W* has never attempted any legal action against any of the fraudulent firms involved. You know, great little outfits like Bre-X, MTEI, CTRN, and so on. And--here's the NEW part--what if the people who'd been damaged by those frauds decided to sue B***** W, which undoubtedly has more money than some scuzzy pink sheet about to close its doors? THAT, I think, is what B**** W* is REALLY worried about. They're trying to look "conscientious" by going after us because we're easy game. Or so they believe.