Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Global Thermoelectric - SOFC Fuel cells (GLE:TSE) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: marcos who wrote (1145)	4/20/1999 9:45:00 PM
From: blue_chip	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 6016

Marco's that was the statement mike rowe made, not I.

To: marcos who wrote (1145)	4/20/1999 9:47:00 PM
From: michael a. rowe	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 6016

Ballard web site too busy...? maybe they have a system problem or maybe its cause of the news today? dont know but it never happened to me before. Doesnt seem like anyone on here is qualified to make statements about the heat of various cells being good or bad. My opinion though is...and yes I agree with my previous statement... an ice if allowed to will overheat.... heat is removed by cooling, used in winter...but we dont want it around too much in the combustion chamber..metals expand etc... its the explosion in the cylinder that is what needed fuel cells must run at constant temp to maitain the reaction some run hotter than others in order to facilitate the reaction an ice is never allow to get up to the temperature of an SOFC otherwise it would sieze up.... how long will it take for your cell to get to 800 degrees? mike