Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Incorporated (QCOM) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: gdichaz who wrote (27741)	4/20/1999 10:13:00 PM
From: marginmike	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 152472

Ya I picked that up. Will definitly buy some LWIN in the AM

To: gdichaz who wrote (27741)	4/20/1999 11:29:00 PM
From: Mr. Sunshine	Respond to of 152472

Regarding QCOM writeoff of LWIN warrants, I posted this on the Leap thread, but it is appropriate here also: In the QCOM conference call, the CFO said that they were taking a $3 Million loss on the cancellation of a PORTION of the Leap warrants to ensure Leap qualifies for the FCC auction. QCOM's justification was that Leap winning the bids would help CDMA acceptance in the U.S. (as if it needs help at this point) and increase ASIC and phone sales. What a "portion" is, I do not know. But I sure would like to find out. Did'nt QCOM have enough warrants to buy back 18% of Leap? At what level could QCOM own Leap so that Leap is considered a "small company"? Perhaps they cancelled enough warrants to bring their potential ownership to less than 5%. That's my guess. Steve P.S. Just did some quick math. WAGed most of the numbers, but writing off their cost basis of 13% of Leap could very well be in the neighborhood of $3 Million if the cost basis was about $1 per warrant. All this thinking is making my brain hurt. Since I own both QCOM and LWIN (from the spinoff) it would be about a wash for me anyway. ------ Previous