Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Incorporated (QCOM) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: John Biddle who wrote (27848)	4/21/1999 10:31:00 AM
From: quidditch	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 152472

This is a feeding frenzy of posts! How is a poor working slob like me supposed to get any work done? John, DaveMG: I think that the Thornley statement about estimating royalties for purposes of recording an accrual number was based on the proportion of Q's handset sales to Q's ASIC sales, as their internal rule of thumb. Don't know if this helps. JG, Jon: Agree with JGoren's conclusion. Imo, they will not convene a special meeting of S/H just to authorize more shares to enable a further split. A further note to you guys and girls: again, Steve's (of the ASIC Div) comment on the CC astounds me: "whether a licensee is signed for one of Q's patents or for all, it is the same royalty structure." Amazing implications! Congratulations to the tenured holders. Regards. Liacos_samui