Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Clinton's Scandals: Is this corruption the worst ever? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Catfish who wrote (12210)	4/21/1999 9:42:00 PM
From: Broken_Clock	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 13994

darrell, On this I disagree, Pres. Bush did push the NWO theme very hard. I think he is conflicted with his massive oil holdings. he is CFR from way back, as well as CIA, a major tool of NWO. Good Cop, but still paying homage to one world Pax Americana(= Pax by Force).

To: Catfish who wrote (12210)	4/22/1999 7:19:00 AM
From: Liatris Spicata	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 13994

Darrell- <<A "New World Order" based on diminished or obliterated national sovereignty of all nations is unacceptable by any standard>> Not by mine. I think the concept of a nation state- a rather recent arrival in human history- is a rather artificial one. It's not clear to me that it's been a net benefit. My loyalties are not to a state. They may be to a civilization- they most certainly are to my friends. But a political boundary does not inspire my devotion. BTW, I think one of the major contributions of laissez-faire capitalism is that in transcends- and even diminishes the importance of- national boundaries. All to the good, IMO. Of course, I am suspicious of world government- or any government for that matter. A world government with the likes of Billary at its helm is enough to make my spine shiver! Larry