Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : IFMX - Investment Discussion -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Marq Spencer who wrote (13237)	4/22/1999 7:55:00 PM
From: SKIP PAUL	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 14631

Are you basing this on knowledge of Generally accepted accounting principles?

To: Marq Spencer who wrote (13237)	4/26/1999 11:11:00 PM
From: Dinesh	Respond to of 14631

I don't think that's the issue here. No one is saying that the $9.5m is insignificant. The issue here is that you cannot look at the revenue numbers in a vaccum and say aha! the growth isn't phenomenal, or that the stock hasn't risen much. The total enterprise value is what really counts (and, rightfully you should also add in any debt to the market cap to arrive at the EV number.) SO, to go by your theory, the stock should fall _farther_, given the _larger_ issued and outstanding. That's an interesting position and hardly a bullish one, may I add. Lets cut to the chase and consider this. If IFMX were a privately held entity (meaning, no stock prices to guide you) what kind of takeout numbers will you be putting on it ? Regards Dinesh