SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Compaq -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: rupert1 who wrote (59290)4/22/1999 3:41:00 AM
From: rupert1  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 97611
 
WSJ this morning. It looks like there are some new lowering of estimates on the way - at least until Rosen gives guidance - but perhaps not downgrades. It is difficult to see what Rosen said yesterday that justifies lower estimates. It seems that some analysts were piqued again.

April 22, 1999

Ousted Compaq CEO Speaks Out;
Claims He Was Firm's Scapegoat
By GARY MCWILLIAMS
Staff Reporter of THE WALL STREET JOURNAL

Eckhard Pfeiffer, ousted as Compaq Computer Corp.'s chief executive over the weekend, defended his management of the struggling company and said he was a scapegoat for Wall Street.

Mr. Pfeiffer's comments Wednesday came as the huge computer maker said it earned $281 million, or 16 cents a diluted share, in the first quarter, in line with its warning earlier this month of lower-than-expected earnings. In the first quarter last year, when the company was wracked with inventory problems, it had net income of $16 million, or one cent a share.


Revenue was $9.42 billion, up 66% from the $5.69 billion in the year-earlier period, before its acquisition of Digital Equipment Corp. However, revenue fell 13% from the fourth quarter's $10.86 billion.

In an interview Wednesday with the CNNfn cable network, Mr. Pfeiffer further criticized Compaq's board. "The feedback I've been getting from many, many people is that the Compaq board should hang their heads in shame," he said. "I believe the board contacted the wrong sources" to get information on the company's situation, he continued. "I also would have expected after the March board meeting that I would have had a chance to present in the April meeting a recovery plan."

Mr. Pfeiffer said his boss, company Chairman Benjamin M. Rosen, a former Wall Street analyst who became a venture capitalist, listens carefully to Wall Street investors. "They are a significant influence on him, based on his past experience," he said. A company spokesman said Mr. Rosen had no comment on Mr. Pfeiffer's remarks.

Mr. Pfeiffer insisted he had been on top of the revenue woes, describing tremendous efforts to cope with what he saw as an industrywide slowing in commercial PC sales. "We made a gigantic attempt to make up for it that went to the last hour of the quarter. And we didn't make it," he said.

Mr. Pfeiffer, who has been roundly criticized for blaming industry conditions without acknowledging any missteps of his own, stuck to his position despite positive first-quarter reports by industry giants International Business Machines Corp., Microsoft Corp. and Intel Corp.

In New York Stock Exchange composite trading, Compaq shares closed up 25 cents at $24.25. Analysts said they were preparing to further reduce their 1999 profit projection of $2 billion, or $1.20 a share, as a result of the uncertainty surrounding the Houston company's plans.


"My estimates have to come down. There's no two ways about it," said Ashok Kumar, analyst at US Bancorp Piper Jaffray, who now sees a $1.20-a-share profit. SG Cowen Securities managing director Richard Chu said he probably will drop his 1999 earnings estimate to $1.7 billion, or $1 a share. "They're taking the line they're not contemplating a restructuring although, in the same breath, Mr. Rosen will hasten to add they're looking at everything," Mr. Chu said.

Mr. Rosen called the management shakeup, in which Chief Financial Officer Earl L. Mason also resigned, the result of a combination of things. It would be "incorrect to associate it with any single event," he said.

Mr. Rosen declined to further detail the issues, other than to cite slowing growth in Compaq's corporate PC business, higher-than-expected sales of low-profit computers and PC pricing pressures. "What we're doing now is looking ahead and trying to plan for the future," he said.

Michael D. Heil, senior vice president, sales and marketing, said the first quarter's results show "considerable moderation of commercial PC demand in the U.S. and world-wide." Mr. Pfeiffer said that even if the company had hit its revenue goal, Compaq "could have fallen short on profit given the pricing pressure."

Compaq's gross profit margin fell to an annualized 24.7% from 26.4% in the fourth quarter, a reflection of the increased sales of low-profit PCs. Richard Gardner III, an analyst at Salomon Smith Barney, said one worrisome sign was a decrease in inventory turns, a measure of manufacturing efficiency. The rate fell to 13.7 turns from 15.5 turns in the fourth quarter. In contrast, Dell Computer Corp. turns its inventory nearly 60 times a year.

John T. Rose, senior vice president of Compaq's Enterprise Computing Group, said sales of its most expensive central computers also fell short. "There was some execution issues we had at the very high end that caused us a miss [sales projections] a little bit



To: rupert1 who wrote (59290)4/22/1999 11:19:00 AM
From: jim kelley  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 97611
 
Victor,

Let us go through this once again. 20 +32= 52
42+16=58. Thus, for the 2 quarters I was low by 6 cents per share.
On the other hand most of the people here gave consensus figures which were 42+35= 77. So the joke is on you Victor.

My position has been that CPQ could have made its 32 cent number if they could have stuffed the channel again. But instead CPQ internal inventories are 4.8 weeks and their external inventories are 4 weeks for a total of 8.8 weeks. Additionally, their accounts receivable jumped up on lower sales indicating that they had to make deals to get some of the channel to take stuff. This may come back against them in the form of price protection writeoffs. One reason their margins are reduced is that they suffered from price protection due to their Q4 bloat.

Not a pretty picture!