Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Les H who wrote (43484)	4/22/1999 10:04:00 AM
From: Daniel Schuh	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 67261

Only a coward calls someone else a coward. , says Les. But then, given the following 4 posts from Allen, Message 8963646 Message 8981351 Message 8958580 Message 9069168 the line changes a bit, eh, Les? Consistency is the hobgoblin of small minds, right, Les? Then we're back to the Reagan site for a rehash of those cumulative budget deficit numbers. "The miracle of compound interest" and all that, 3% a year for 8 years makes 24 %. Some miracle, Les. Show me the numbers. Show me the hypothetical '89 Reagan budget that's 24% under what was passed. Don't touch SS, unless you want to explain how running a bigger SS surplus fits into your brilliant "cumulative deficit" / "Miracle of compound interest" argument. More likely, I expect you'll just call me a commie again. "Logic and reason" rules in this fetid forum, as ever.