Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Incorporated (QCOM) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: SKIP PAUL who wrote (28093)	4/22/1999 1:26:00 PM
From: engineer	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 152472

Pretty boring day, eh? down 6 and holding.....We are not getting 10 posts a minute like yesterday... But on the good side, it is showing alot of support for the 188 level. If it held there for a day or two, it would be excellent while it established a base there and then spit at 95.

To: SKIP PAUL who wrote (28093)	4/22/1999 1:33:00 PM
From: Caxton Rhodes	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 152472

Interesting comment from our pal George Gilder: To: +George Gilder (1288 ) From: +Darrell Smith Wednesday, Apr 21 1999 2:54PM ET Reply # of 1334 <<who failed to board the Qualcomm-Ericcson [!] express toward Third Generation CDMA>> and to which 3G are you referring? CDMA2000, WCDMA or just the new "CDMA"? Certainly cost is still a factor, as is capability and switching from current GSM to the "right" 3G. I didn't realize that ERICY was obligated to consistently use QCOM's 3G version; three modes are still the modus operandi/ the terms of which are still being discussed (from what I read). To: +Darrell Smith (1313 ) From: +George Gilder Thursday, Apr 22 1999 1:39AM ET Reply # of 1334 Ericsson did not buy Qualcomm's infrastructure division in order to do some minority version of CDMA.