SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Anthony @ Equity Investigations, Dear Anthony, -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: FrozenZ who wrote (32026)4/22/1999 12:29:00 PM
From: J.Y. Wang  Respond to of 122088
 
<NSOL>

The street hates downside uncertainty. For evidence of that, look at MO and RN. Massive cash cows but severely undervalued because of uncertainty of litigation. Everytime there is a settlement between tobacco and the government -- no matter how many tens of billions it costs tobacco -- tobacco stocks jump because uncertainty has been reduced.

The amount NSOL can charge its competitors was set yesterday at $9, I believe. That took uncertainty out of NSOL. The number could have been as low as $2 but as high as $13 or so. That's one of the reasons NSOL ran. Another reason is that NSOL had really been hammered and net stocks ran yesterday, so it ran more than others. It's still a POS.

After I typed my comments here, I read Asensio's comments and I agree with Asensio (we basically stated the same things). What is helping NSOL in the stock market is its name recognition. To be completely honest, I am concerned about my short position in NSOL, but I'm only human.



To: FrozenZ who wrote (32026)4/22/1999 12:38:00 PM
From: Katelew  Respond to of 122088
 
Today's Street.com article does good job trying to explain yesterday's runup in NSOL, IMO. Also, great earnings were going to be released today, and they were.