Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : IMDS nasdaq bulletin board -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Labrador who wrote (3155)	4/23/1999 8:45:00 AM
From: kenita	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 4122

Look for big hype from IDSI on international sales and promises of revenue.

To: Labrador who wrote (3155)	4/25/1999 5:09:00 PM
From: Dan O	Respond to of 4122

Compare what you read at Andrews site where he scanned the FDA reports to what Deb told me thru email and be your own judge about the way this company deals with its investors: Subj: Re: lintronics Date: 98-08-20 11:22:37 EDT From: DebOBrien To: DOleary383 The Grables sold Lintronics to a Company in Tampa and from my understanding I heard that that Company turned Lintronics into a health Channel. So to answer your question no the Grables were not involved I sent an instant message to deb obrien explaining that the SEC and the florida state attorney general would not look kindly on repeat offenders IF the rumors were true. Here is the response: DebOBrien: i answered your email-please do not threaten me with SEC rules I know all about them. Once again NO THE GRABLES WERE NEVER INVESTIGATED BY THE FDA!!!! DO you honestly think that FDA would be so cooperative now if they were-I dont CARE what the message boards state it is once again false information!!! I did not have time to answer your second email because i have been answering all the other emails and phone calls We have 9000 shareholders please give me a chance i will be with when I can. DebOBrien: This information was on AOL years ago I gave an explaination then -why dont you post my answer More from Deb Obrien from August when the Lintronics accusation first came out. Judge for yourself: DebOBrien: I have seen it it does not mention the GRABLEs I have gotten several emails regarding this and once again the Grables had sold the company to a company in Tampa they inturn did something with the Company that had nothing to do with the GRABLES they were not involved. I have posted in the past and my experience is dealing with people who remain anonymous having something to hide and no matter what I stated or how many times I stated the question was continuously asked. The borads are not governed DebOBrien: by the SEC and the General Cousel discourage against it I will answer anyone who want to email me directly-I have to go I am in the middle of answering someone elses email give me 5 minutes And here is a REAL winner. I had emailed the following to Deb after her initial answer to me. Note my questions (2 of them) and her answers (3 of them): ubj: Re: lintronics Date: 98-08-20 20:42:27 EDT From: DOleary383 To: DebOBrien Your answer was somewhat Clintonesque in that you state that they owned it but sold it and therefore were not involved. The incident occurred in the early to mid-nineties I believe. The issues are "were the Grables involved in the lingtroscan" and "were they responsible for the sales which led to the FDA enforcement letter?. Here is Deb's response, which is curious given what you can read at Andrew's site: "NO, no, and no." Here is another email from Deb on Lintronics. Again, I will leave it to each of you to determine its accuracy after you review the site at which Andrew scanned the FDA reports: "I stated in my last email your information was forward to the appropriate people if action has not been quick enough for you I apologize. If you would like to see the "real" FOIA it is public information. Not the one that has been altered. I stated to you before yes, the grables owned a company called Lintronics and then sold it to a group in Tampa who in turn got into trouble from the FDA but the GRABLEs were not involved at that time. Yes Mr, Grable owned the lintro scan and it is transillumination which is still being widely used in China-the FDA however will not allow it to be used here in the US based on the group in tampa. The point is however that Lintronics has NOTHING to do with IMDS. IMDS is not only ran by the GRABLEs another Founder ALLAN SChwartz and 37 other employees are involved with this endevor. I believe that the emails should end and you should phone the office so that you may have the correct information and not the bits and peices you are learning on the internet." So, is everyone comfortable with Debs credibility after reading Andrew's site?