Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : SIV /vse- STARTECK INDUSTRIES LTD -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Rocket Red who wrote (40)	4/22/1999 11:36:00 PM
From: Rise	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 166

If we don't get news on GGl soon, I'm out and averaging up on AQU. Maybe I'll even take a nibble on the SCS, but right now, haven't done any dd. PSM, well I'll probably keep it and average down if it goes lower. I only have 7000 shares so its not going to hurt me to much if it falls. Whoops I forgot. This is the SIV thread. Go SIV go. Long on SIV and hoping for $1.00 on the open. Rise

To: Rocket Red who wrote (40)	4/22/1999 11:47:00 PM
From: Intrepid1	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 166

SIV's problem is that it has no real power brokers like Canaccord or Yorkton behind them. If that were the case there never would have been a halt. VSE has nothing against Eng, I understand they do have a hard-on for the former President of SIV. The question to ask the VSE is if they do have a problem with former management who are still major shareholders, why did they ever let SIV come back after its previous halt last year, only to halt it again the one day it began showing some life? The VSE's treatment of SIV shareholders is actionable. I doubt however anyone will bother hiring a lawyer given the relatively small amount of money involved. All I suggest is keep writing, phoning, faxing and emailing the VSE until they either cancel all trades made on Tuesday April 20, or they let SIV trade again. good luck etc.