SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Osicom(FIBR) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Brian who wrote (9522)4/23/1999 8:05:00 AM
From: Wally Mastroly  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 10479
 
FIBR press release: Comments on status of core business -

biz.yahoo.com



To: Brian who wrote (9522)4/23/1999 11:30:00 AM
From: Harlock  Respond to of 10479
 
That was a most interesting technical insight, Hilly. Of course
the shorts will be all over FIBR now I would've beeen if I wanted a
stock to short. Conspiracy theorists, consider that the ammunition
for the current bashing was served up a la carte by Par himself.

I will remain in my cash long position because the damage
is so great that the difference between current losses and losses
if we go to PENNIES is small enough to warrant hanging in.

CAN ANYONE PRIVATE MAIL ME A GOOD PIC OF PAR ?
I feel the need to create some evil humor to deal with
the tension !!!



To: Brian who wrote (9522)4/23/1999 12:23:00 PM
From: David Wise  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 10479
 
Brian, thanks for posting the Backdoor_Hilly post from Yahoo. I'm glad to see someone else thought the flurry of class actions in one day was more than coincidence. I even noticed they used much of the same language. Usually it takes a while for a shareholder to contact a lawyer (aren't they usually busy), get an appointment, and for the lawyer to do some checking and have an assistant write up something and get it filed. In this case, it was all ready.

Besides, the Bloomberg article was not accurate. Another article implied that the 3 for 1 reverse split came at the same time as the Hong Kong news and helped drive the price up. How wrong can they be! I'm sure you remember the painful slide after the reverse split.

I don't have time to answer all of the Pink fans (Mama Bear, Auric and some others I never heard of). I guess they'll claim they all made big money on this even though we all know they came late to the party. They're probably posting on the short threads already about their great victories.

I think Afaq has a good case for a lawsuit against Auric for claiming he was a "paid hypster". I notice they mention my name a lot, but I probably posted two days in a month about FIBR. Just proves they haven't been following this. Someone noticed the news and alerted the others and they all came flying in like vultures. They are to be pitied. They have no lives and only look for apparent dying companies to pick up little pieces of rotten leftovers from the bones. Last time Auric claimed to short at about $7 a few months ago the dying company got new life and bit the heck out him. Now he's back for more. Just pity them. Mama Bear - what a pathetic old woman with no life but to post on short chat lines all day! Pity her!

I'm not happy with Par for many things, but look what he's had to deal with. I was fortunate to sell in stages and average $18. Guess I figured it had been too quiet and suspected something was up. Hope the truth comes out some day. May be a good time to get back on this cat of 7 lives!




To: Brian who wrote (9522)4/23/1999 12:55:00 PM
From: Joe Wagner  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 10479
 
I agree with this post. I bought more shares this morning. The lawsuit being announced so quickly, this whole things seems like a set up to drive the price down with massive short selling. At some point they will start to buy back those shares slowly but surely so as not to drive the price up too quick. Then a news article will probably come out with some unexpected positive news and this thing will pop as they drive the price back up.