SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Ask Michael Burke -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: re3 who wrote (57103)4/23/1999 8:18:00 AM
From: accountclosed  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 132070
 
option income is a different portfolio than 90/10...90 is money market 10 is options. <--- currently 40% total of mb's portfolio

options income is currently 50%

cap app'n is currently 10%

=====
yes money can be lost in options income just as in a bond portfolio. some of his buy/writes (short puts) he hedges with lower strike puts.



To: re3 who wrote (57103)4/23/1999 10:38:00 AM
From: Knighty Tin  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 132070
 
Howard, Don't mistake my income portfolio for 90/10. Totally different portfolios with different operations and risk levels.

The 90/10 could show a loss at some time. It never has, but since I am not earning 10% on the 90, it is certainly possible if I hit a bad stretch. So far, this 90/10 cycle (dating from Dec 7) has been frustrating, but far from a loser. Frustrating because I have had more losers than winners. However, it doesn't take many Compaqs, MUs, Merrills, Xilinxs, Lillys, etc. to make up for the losers. For example, CPQ is up 1400% if I lose all the money on the puts I own now. That means I can lose on 14 positions and break even on a portfolio basis. However, this has not been one of my better cycles. I have not had a huge homerun stock, though CPQ is getting close. And my usual stock batting avg. of about .500 is definitely in a slump. Of course, the fact that the market is hitting all time highs every day doesn't help. <g>