Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : TSIG.com TIGI (formerly TSIG) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: The Swordsman who wrote (26546)	4/23/1999 9:27:00 AM
From: ztect	Respond to of 44908

Message 7139601 To: Eagle (14167 ) From: The Swordsman Wednesday, Jan 6 1999 9:30PM ET Reply # of 26471 Probably because I'm doing a project for a CCI prospect. And they like the idea, and it may be a green light. No guarantee, but looks good. And please no questions, and no I cannot tell who or how big, but wow! That's how I got here to begin with. sword +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Message 7530157 To: Bald Eagle (15907 ) From: The Swordsman Thursday, Jan 28 1999 10:50AM ET Reply # of 26490 Instinct tells me that the PP will probably cause dilution but if the company continues to execute as it has, I think we'll see revenue at the bottom line this quarter and much more as time progress's. While I don't want to diminish its importance (the PP), God knows how hard I hammered on the subject last week, I believe that it will be a fact of life but not so that we won't reach our destination. Profitability. As I have once said I have a large client that is in the proposal mode and it looks like it will happen. The dollars are too large to comprehend. They have shut me down so I have to live with snipets from lower level people. sword

To: The Swordsman who wrote (26546)	4/23/1999 9:29:00 AM
From: ztect	Respond to of 44908

Message 7071810 To: KIPPer (13803 ) From: The Swordsman Saturday, Jan 2 1999 11:41AM ET Reply # of 26466 Mostly lurking, but I don't believe that SI will do anything about DD's neagative postings. Quite frankly his posts are actual excerpts from the 10K and worthwhile to read. However, I do agree that the repetitiveness with which he posts the same info tells us where he's coming from. The only defense against this kind of poster would appear to me to be continued pressure upon him to call the company, get the answers and then post here. If he doesn't do it then maybe someone should. Further, I would say that after 4 or 5 repetitive posts in the same few hours a complaint could then be lodged with SI for their consideration. It would be an harassment issue. Sword

To: The Swordsman who wrote (26546)	4/23/1999 9:47:00 AM
From: V$gas.Com	Respond to of 44908

To: The Swordsman (26395 ) From: V$gas.Com Thursday, Apr 22 1999 1:36PM ET Reply # of 26549 Swordsman, I have said that I will not respond to the likes of you, but here goes anyway. Are you aware that the doors are open at TSIG.COM and that you may walk through them at any time to review any documents you wish to peruse? And I know you are aware that you have not contacted the company in any way shape or form to have questions answered or to request any documents to allay your inuendoes. If you truly want answers to your questions, visit the company, and by all means take an attorney with you. You can afford to pay for one I am sure. I will not be a part of your SOLICITED group, which by the way is against SEC regulations. You do not have to be an attorney. Right now the company is trying to achieve a share price in order to obtain the necessary financial vehicle at the best rates possible to put the PP and R. Gordons loan agreements to rest. The higher the stock price the more favorable the rates. You are probably not aware of this as your tirades, are in essence, costing the company money. It seems more important to you to have your ego massaged than to really do any true research and find out what is going on. I do have one question, and I think I already know th answer, but it would be nice to here it from you. Are you now, or have you ever been associated with Darrel Piercy or Compact Connection? Can you answer that question truthfully? V$gas.Com

To: The Swordsman who wrote (26546)	4/23/1999 9:48:00 AM
From: V$gas.Com	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 44908

I honestly beleive that now is the time to bring it to the attention of anyone who is honestly going to give Sword money for his personal agenda. 1. If Robert Gordon had/has done anything illegal, why would he document what he has done and file it in a 10KSB? 2. You have been asked to provide money to Swords cause. Are you aware that the 10KSB was written by SEC attorneys? 3. Have you noticed that Sword evades questions posed to him about CCI and Darrel Piercy? 4. Are you aware that he is an admitted lier and that he tried to structure a deal between an outside company and CCI? To: The Swordsman (26546 ) From: ztect Friday, Apr 23 1999 9:26AM ET Reply # of 26552 Message 7139601 To: Eagle (14167 ) From: The Swordsman Wednesday, Jan 6 1999 9:30PM ET Reply # of 26471 Probably because I'm doing a project for a CCI prospect. And they like the idea, and it may be a green light. No guarantee, but looks good. And please no questions, and no I cannot tell who or how big, but wow! That's how I got here to begin with. sword You can either do your own research, and decide, or you can give money to Sward to have an attorney tell you the filing was done correctly and that nothing was done illegally. READ POINTS 1 & 2 ABOVE. It is your money, however selling this stock and moving on is cheaper than funding Swords whim. V

To: The Swordsman who wrote (26546)	4/23/1999 10:12:00 AM
From: V$gas.Com	Respond to of 44908

One more question for you Sword. Have you ever been an employee of Teleservices International Group or any of its subsidiaries or affiliates? A simple yes or no will suffice. And remember this is of public record. V