Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Naxos Resources (NAXOF) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Paunch who wrote (18655)	4/23/1999 3:16:00 PM
From: mark silvers	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 20681

Paunch, I'll keep my fingers crossed, or anything else that may help too:-) Mark

To: Paunch who wrote (18655)	4/23/1999 3:49:00 PM
From: Tom Frederick	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 20681

Paunch, thanks for your good wishes. In all honesty, and as I have said many times, this is not a battle of the DD's. They can all succeed and I hope that yours do as well. But for now, and for all of us, we need solid proof before any of them will move. Tom F.

To: Paunch who wrote (18655)	4/23/1999 3:53:00 PM
From: Larry Macklin	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 20681

Paunch, I would love to agree with you in your assessment of j/l and MGAU, really i would. But i don't see how that one check from the refinery is "PROOF" of anything. A 50,000 check would be a lot closer to proof but a third party engineering firm saying that the MGAU property is economicly viable is really proof. Of course, if you keep getting checks for 50,000 every week you might not need any other proof. I still say third party proof is the way to go to get financing and to build a real mine. I think it will be more difficult than you think to Boot Strap MG. All that said.....good luck to you, hope MG goes thru the roof!!!! (naxos too) Larry MAcklin