Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : TSIG.com TIGI (formerly TSIG) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Suzanne Newsome who wrote (26580)	4/23/1999 3:39:00 PM
From: MskiHntr	Respond to of 44908

Thank you for confirming Marty's post.

To: Suzanne Newsome who wrote (26580)	4/23/1999 3:46:00 PM
From: Phxphenom	Respond to of 44908

Thank you!!!! It is so refreshing to hear from someone other than REW and Marty willing to call the company and report back their findings. This is what I call Due Diligence and I too am "perfectly comfortable with all that has happened". I appreciate your candid report. Beign Right, Sitting Tight!!!!!

To: Suzanne Newsome who wrote (26580)	4/23/1999 3:56:00 PM
From: REW	Respond to of 44908

Thanks Suzanne, Your efforts are deeply appreciated. Bob

To: Suzanne Newsome who wrote (26580)	4/23/1999 3:57:00 PM
From: Tom	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 44908

Suzanne: Thank you for taking the time to ask the right people the right questions. And thank you for sharing with us...

To: Suzanne Newsome who wrote (26580)	4/23/1999 3:58:00 PM
From: ztect	Respond to of 44908

Suzanne.... Thank you very much for taking the time to voice your concerns directly to Paul Henry. Thank you also for sharing your answer on the thread. Per your comments, you noted: "...He added, however, that if a group of shareholders got together and asked Gordon to remove the agreement, he may do it...." "...It seems to me that adding a 5th person the board would strengthen the group and provide more balance. If that person were Marty Frankel, I believe shareholder confidence would go up...." Do you (or any one else who reads this thread)have any insights or ideas as to how we as shareholders should collectively voice our opinions on these two matters above? Did Henry note when and if there would be a share holder meeting? This would seem like an appropriate time to raise these issues. Or should there be a letter circulated, and should we obtain signatures. I am also very glad to read that you now are satisfied regarding the current outright holdings of Gordon "...But Mr. Gordon's outright ownership of 14 million shares total is not inappropriate in my opinion...." Thank you again for your sane and rational approach to addressing these concerns of your's and mine as well. Sincerely, ztect

To: Suzanne Newsome who wrote (26580)	4/23/1999 4:34:00 PM
From: Jazzbo	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 44908

Why, Suzanne, you must indeed be charming. Thanks, Tim

To: Suzanne Newsome who wrote (26580)	4/23/1999 6:34:00 PM
From: Andrew H	Respond to of 44908

Thanks, Suzanne, for your trouble and forthright answers. All in all the news is pretty good. Personally, I would love to see those 26.6M shares retired. Then, if 1/2 the PP was not needed and the rest was converted at a reasonable price, we could see about 35M shares eliminated from the OS total. That would be great, IMO.

To: Suzanne Newsome who wrote (26580)	4/23/1999 6:44:00 PM
From: cicak	Respond to of 44908

Thanks for the information Suzanne. :~) Regards, phil.com

To: Suzanne Newsome who wrote (26580)	4/23/1999 7:52:00 PM
From: secureit	Respond to of 44908

Thanks Suzanne for your DD and posting to the thread. Now hopefully we can put the RG share issue to rest and move forward. At this point in time and understanding the situation I am OK with RG's 14MM share count. I too would like to see Marty on the BOD if Marty is inclined. All Good Regards; Paul