Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Ask Michael Burke -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Earlie who wrote (57187)	4/23/1999 6:03:00 PM
From: Tommaso	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 132070

At first I thought this a satire, but seems it's serious: exchange2000.com

To: Earlie who wrote (57187)	4/23/1999 6:30:00 PM
From: Alohal	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 132070

Earlie: I wouldn't touch IBM's stock with a ten foot pole, as I said in an earlier post, I only invest in the best. Be that as it may, my post was in reference to your laughable assertion that Gerstner was "scamming" people because this Quarter's results only appeared so good because the previous year's quarter was so bad. I fail to see how this is a scam. It's right there in the numbers, for any investor with even a partial brain to see. It's not a "scam" in any sense of the word that I'm familiar with. People who invest in companies without even knowing how to read a quarterly or annual report are truly gambling. You may have your reasons to believe that he is scamming investors, but if you are going to assert it you better have some hard evidence to back it up. You come up with such evidence and you will indeed be doing investors a service, but to simply mumble and grumble about scams without the evidence simply hurts your credibility. If you are so certain there is a scam and and you were an investor in the company I could see your concern (or maybe not, since as you say you would have seen you investment up 400% over the last three years) but clearly you are not an investor in IBM. The other possibility is that you have been betting against IBM's stock rise all this time and are now ragging at the fact that you have been on the losing end of those bets, "but only because investors are being scammed". I think the second scenario is much more likely. Of course I'm always open to other explanations of why you might see yourself as the "guardian" of IBM investor's interests. Good luck. Alohal

To: Earlie who wrote (57187)	4/24/1999 2:38:00 PM
From: Knighty Tin	Respond to of 132070

Earlie, Nudge, nudge, wink wink. <g>