SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Jim's Nasdaq100 Special as a basket. -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Monty Lenard who wrote (512)4/24/1999 12:10:00 AM
From: James F. Hopkins  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 2103
 
Hi Monty; wasn't that IBM a blast, the old shorts covered then
more jumped on who knows were it will stop , I told Mike she was
going to $300 or $400 , he shorted her yesterday <G>

Well I missed this qqq twice trying to play the USPIX fund,
so that backed me playing her with a fund.
Having to take closing price makes me too nervous, at least on the
short side and the fund is 2X the qqq. Also I have to get the order
in by 2:15 and often she don't show her real colors till just
after that.
I'm turning over in my mind another way to play her but haven't
worked out all the details.
Using The Mc for the main signal to go long in the UOPIX, and
being the Mc is sometimes slow, and with the handicap of getting
in and out of the fund , I'm thinking to try to short term trade short/cover on down swings the qqq itself.
Also playing the longside in the IRA , and the short one in my
regular account, but I don't know.
Where I may lose some money on the shorts, I get a write off
and I think the long in term the IRA long will over time do
better if I use the Mc signal, so I defer the tax there,
however , I don't know ( later when I take money out of the IRA
is it taxed more or less than capital gains ? )
Or does that depend on what I make that year ?
The idea of shorting while long is to offset some of the down days
and I can short/cover faster than getting in/out of the
fund & maybe get some of the mid day breaks.
I'll have to study on it more as it still sounds a bit
confusing to me, that takes the cake when you can confuse
yourself , and I think I just did. <G>
Jim





To: Monty Lenard who wrote (512)4/24/1999 12:45:00 AM
From: Compadre  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 2103
 
Monty: <<Even IBM looked like an internet stock yesterday.>> LOL, but IBM is an internet stock. They were one of the first to get into Prodigy. They got rid of that but they bought Lotus the creators of Lotus Notes. Not to mention all the networking equipment that they have in their product line.

I think that should qualify them as an I-net company, don't you think? <<G>>

Regards,

Jaime