Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : Bid.com International (BIDS) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Jerry B. who wrote (25211)	4/23/1999 10:14:00 PM
From: Dave Kiernan	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 37507

Jerry B, you said it, I agree. Many people on this thread do not seem to realize that the runner BII is no longer stabled in Toronto. They are guarding the doors of an empty barn...trash talking about Pavan,the Star, ad naseum. Thank goodness the Americans have the sense to recognize a winner and run with it....gonna go like the Santa Anna winds. PS: Maybe someone should start a real BIDS thread, instead of a painted over BII, cause it sure aint workin'.....man even gets dissed for postin' useful links to new investors instead of talkin' hoser talk. geocities.com funds.cnnfn.com

To: Jerry B. who wrote (25211)	4/23/1999 10:15:00 PM
From: F. Evans	Respond to of 37507

Jerry...thanks....I'm just really sick and tired of all this crap....Their opinions change with the wind and It bugs me big time when gutless individuals spew nothing but garbage...and it's the same old song and dance everytime....They are just too damn stupid to see what is really going on. I have already filed my written complaint to the OSC about Yorkton and I have called Pavan and the National Post...I spoke to the writer of the story and I will be providing him with information to hopefully lead to another article in which the facts are correctly reported..... IF YORKTON DOWNGRADES BECAUSE OF QUESTIONABLE ACCOUNTING PRACTICES...THEN THEY ARE LEGALLY NEGLIGENT FOR CALLING THIS STOCK A SPECULATIVE BUY WHEN THEY DID THEIR 3 UNDERWRITINGS BECAUSE THEY EITHER KNEW OR OUGHT TO HAVE KNOWN AT THE TIME THEY RECOMMENDED THE STOCK THAT SOMETHING WASN'T RIGHT....WHY?..BECAUSE THE COMPANY HAS USED THE SAME ACCOUNTING PRINCIPALS SINCE 1997!! GOT THAT DAGAN!!! Now, that's not to say that BII did anything wrong to begin with....Why? Because they were following GAP procedures and they were audited....THEREFORE TO ME THERE IS NO ISSUE!!!! Frank