Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : TSIG.com TIGI (formerly TSIG) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Suzanne Newsome who wrote (26606)	4/23/1999 10:56:00 PM
From: cicak	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 44908

Hi Suzanne <<Actually, a party will be held at the Silicon Valley office in May to announce the repositioning of the company as a e-commerce company emphasizing Internet solutions for business. Golin/Harris will use their contacts to get the relevant audience to the party.>> Excellent news !! I wonder who Golin/Harris will invite to the party. Thanks. :~):~) Regards, phil.com

To: Suzanne Newsome who wrote (26606)	4/23/1999 11:18:00 PM
From: Chuck Rubin	Respond to of 44908

Suzanne, I think you are doing some of the best DD I have seen on TSIG.COM!! Please keep up the great work. Your explanation of your conversation with Paul Henry has really cleared up in my mind why the stock is trading where it is with all this great news coming out. I will be clicking on your messages everytime you post. You are one of only a very few posters that I pay attention to. We are lucky to have you on this thread!! I think I understand your charm:>000!!! Chuckr

To: Suzanne Newsome who wrote (26606)	4/23/1999 11:25:00 PM
From: Phxphenom	Respond to of 44908

Suzanne, Bravo!!! Such clarity! Reading your posts are such an experience. Thanks for the DD!!!! You are indeed joining a select group! Marc

To: Suzanne Newsome who wrote (26606)	4/23/1999 11:30:00 PM
From: ztect	Respond to of 44908

Suzanne..... Thank you again for contributing your account of your conversation with Paul Henry to the thread. However, I disagree with you that people are upset and frustrated with you specifically for raising "troublesome" issues. You have raised questions and didn't accept anyone else's answers to questions as "fact". You sought independent verification for your own concerns, which is perfectly fine. For example, the shares owned by Gordon and his family didn't jibe with your own arithmatic so you sought out greater clarification. You did not repetitively and incessantly make statements to purposely impugn people with the company. Your own queries could not be construed as an attempt to manipulate the emotions of others who read this thread. You did not rant, rave, insinuate or blatantly attempt to cast aspersions. No one would have any reason to believe that you have an ulterior motive or agenda as someone who was brought to this thread due to some unstated relationship with CCI. Therefore, please don't group yourself with "others". Your input is greatly appreciated. Sincerely, ztect (spelling not checked)

To: Suzanne Newsome who wrote (26606)	4/23/1999 11:54:00 PM
From: Sammie	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 44908

Another beautiful post! You are gifted when it comes to communicating with words. I don't think anyone on the thread thought twice to question any of your posts. You asked intelligent questions, asked others what they thought about the questions, then you went out and looked for your own answers. What's even better, you gracefully reported your findings and your personal conclusions of your DD to the thread. Thank you for taking the time to share with us. Sammie

To: Suzanne Newsome who wrote (26606)	4/24/1999 6:16:00 AM
From: Ditchdigger	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 44908

Morning Suzanne, you did a great DD job..But Henry's reference <He says most convertible debentures have a ceiling.> is not true. Very rarely does a floorless have a ceiling..Generally if a placement has a ceiling, it will also have a floor..This type of financing is last effort financing,usually placed by companies who's backs are to the wall..After the recent 10K,,it appears to me, their backs have been shoved tighter to that wall...I look for further dilutive financing.An institution would most likely require a cleaning of the books before lending this company money.(I still look for a reverse split down the road...)DD

To: Suzanne Newsome who wrote (26606)	4/24/1999 8:58:00 AM
From: Bald Eagle	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 44908

<<Mr. Henry said TSIG was looking for "institutional semi-permanent financing." >> Does that mean they are going to need the full $10MM of the PP? Is this financing on top of the $10MM PP? We have been told here ( by REW and maybe others, I don't remember ) that the revenue from the Signature deal, which should have started on April 1st, would supply the money for ongoing operations. Has this changed? If so, why? You seem to have the ear of Henry now. Would you ask him these question, please? My daily CD delivery report: My two orders (one on 3/26 and one on 3/30 ) have STILL not been delivered to me. BTW, no e-mail messages either. Oh well, off to the jazz fest again today. It's a tough job, but someone has to do it :-)

To: Suzanne Newsome who wrote (26606)	4/24/1999 5:03:00 PM
From: Jazzbo	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 44908

Hello Suzanne, I think most men are unable to fully comprehend the "charm" possessed by women. Sometimes charm and wiliness are synonymous... now there's a typical male response. Thanks for your efforts. I would like to see "institutional, semi-permanent financing", if that means non-dilutive investment/purchase of a piece of TSIG. All over the radio these days disparate e-commerce companies are calling themselves an "IBM company"; what underlies this advertising pitch is that IBM provides e-commerce solutions for these companies. Well, that sounds just like what John Hwang and company intend to provide to the world, with Microsoft technology, which we are hearing over and over again. (See Fred Thornell's eSuite/eSolution post) Many large technology companies take a piece of small, promising companies, and there's no reason why TSIG shouldn't face a similar situation. Perhaps something of this nature will come to pass. I'd hate to surrender control of the company, though, we've too much on the horizon. Regarding company candor as to finances, I'd like to believe your latter proffer, "a company desperately scrambling to keep its head above water." Sometimes you got to do what you got to do, but you don't go bragging to your friends, at least not the ones you want to keep. I'd like to see more openess in the future, and as our situation improves - supposing that will be the case - what management has to do won't be so odious; better to borrow from your neighbors than someone everybody calls Don, even though his name is Vic. Credibility is something TSIG.com has to build among current shareholders, and I really don't think there are many of us. Golin-Harris will take the word to institutional/larger investors, but it is current management that must convince we longtime, smalltime, individual investors of their intention to increase shareholder value. To that end, two avenues are suggested: a voice of credible reason on the BOD, a voice of the people, responsive to legitimate concerns of the shareholders, and; a statement by RG that will engender the faith of shareholders. I think RG has done a commendable job in developing this company, and I've no problem with compensation, or over-compensation under the right conditions. A telephone conference is probably logistically possible, but a shareholder meeting, face-to-face is preferable. Well, these are just some thoughts. Best, Tim