Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Scumbria who wrote (79901)	4/24/1999 2:50:00 AM
From: Paul Engel	Respond to of 186894

SCUM bria & Intel Investors - Whitney Motherboards are on their way ! Maybe we won't have to wait until June ! Paul {=========================} theregister.co.uk Posted 23/04/99 6:14pm by John Lettice Linux already running on Merced, says Intel CEO Linux is already up and running on Merced, according to Intel CEO Craig Barrett. And putting further flesh on what Microsoft might interpret as some kind of pincer movement strategy, Barrett adds that he expects the low-cost, low-resource StrongARM chip to become optimised for Linux and other (i.e., non-Microsoft) operating systems. Barrett let both of these slip during an Intel analysts meeting earlier this week. It's not clear how much of the Linux optimisation for StrongARM Intel itself is getting involved in, but it seems likely that Merced partner Hewlett-Packard is doing at least some of the leg-work on Linux for Merced. Barrett claims Merced already has support from eight operating systems, but his putting Linux up there indicates something of a change in Intel's previous stated policies for the OS. When Intel put money into Red Hat and started making positive noises about Linux last year it seemed to envisage Linux and Intel as an ideal combination for smaller, high volume servers. But by giving it early support and encouragement on Merced, Intel will be helping position Linux further upscale, in the direction of large enterprises. Another Intel announcement from the analysts meeting however makes it clear the company has an immediate interest in robust, highly-scalable server operating systems. It's planning a series of Internet data centres at $50-100 million a pop. These will house between 2,000 and 5,000 servers, the idea being that Intel will provide content hosting and management for ISPs. The first centre opens in June, with Excite as the customer. The chosen software has not as yet been revealed, but it should be worth looking out for. Also worth watching for will be Intel VP Sean Maloney's keynote at ISPCon in Baltimore on Tuesday. He's due to announce a "major sales programme for ISPs," which is no doubt related to the one Intel just told the analysts about. But Intel chose ISPCon last autumn to make several Linux-related announcements, so watch this space? ® The Bootnotes of Lou Search and view the Old Site Microsoft on trial Links to Software Sites Register Message Boards If you want daily updates on news, enter your email address below, then click the 'Join List' button. Powered by ListBot The Register and its contents are copyright © 1999, Situation Publishing. All rights reserved. Mail: 20-22 Maddox Street, London, W1R 9PG. Tel: +44 (0)171 499 2264 Fax: +44 (0)171 493 5922 Editors: Mike Magee, John Lettice and Drew Cullen Managing Editor (site): Tony Smith. Managing Editor (news): Sean Fleming

To: Scumbria who wrote (79901)	4/24/1999 4:49:00 AM
From: Tenchusatsu	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 186894

<I'm sure that Bill Clinton would have been perfectly happy to have never discussed any of this stuff. It was his political opponents who insisted on stirring up the muck.> Must be that "right wing conspiracy" that Hillary was talking about, before the discovery of the blue dress. So if Clinton just got his blow-jobs without anyone having to know about it, the world would be a better place, right? Never mind that the Oval Office is owned by the taxpayers, including myself who has to pay for capital gains. Now the majority might want to turn a blind eye to this atrocity thanks to Clinton's popularity and the strong economy, but I sure don't. And if I found out that the Oval Office was being used as a place of adultery, I'd insist on stirring up muck. Would that make me a right-wing extremist? It's up to the public to decide whether Clinton's behavior is acceptable or not. But it sure isn't acceptable at all to try and cover-up questionable behavior just because the persons involved didn't think the public needed to know. Remember, Milosevic doesn't think the world needs to know about ethnic cleansing, either. (If this is a stretch, remember that Milosevic thinks the world would have been a much more peaceful place had he been left alone to ethnically cleanse the Albanians in the first place. After all, it's not our problem, is it?) As a pragmatist, you should know about the practicality of letting the public decide for themselves, rather than keeping the public in the dark. Most of us might not care, but some of us do. Tenchusatsu