SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : How high will Microsoft fly? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Sir Francis Drake who wrote (21547)4/24/1999 8:10:00 PM
From: Catcher  Respond to of 74651
 
ototot agree with you on intc. not the same
potential imo as csco msft & a few other stocks
in same general risk parameter



To: Sir Francis Drake who wrote (21547)4/24/1999 8:11:00 PM
From: Bill Fischofer  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 74651
 
Re: INTC

Well, if you held a gun to my head INTC would be the first to go of the four I mentioned, but I wouldn't write it off just yet. Nobody can touch INTC for semiconductor process technology and that is the real basis of their success. Like MSFT, INTC is destined to sport a trillion+ dollar market cap.



To: Sir Francis Drake who wrote (21547)4/24/1999 10:28:00 PM
From: Uncle Frank  Respond to of 74651
 
>>I know I'll catch flak for that, but I just find INTC too cyclical, too vulnerable to radical technological change and competition.

You won't get flamed for your comments on this thread, but I hope you're wearing asbestos underwear if you take your case to Intel's thread <g>. I agree that intc and all the semis are cyclical, but disagree that Intel is at risk from technical change and competition in their niche. They are the sector's Rule Maker, and can change the game to suit themselves at any time. Add to this their own proven strength at technical innovation and manufacturing and they appear pretty bullet proof.

What I don't like is the narrow focus of their efforts over the last few year, persuing faster and faster uprocessors with manic zeal. As well I dislike a business that requires multi-billion dollar investments for every new fab/product generation. But if you're going to invest in semiconductors, Intel is the very best - a Gorilla in the strictest sense of Gorilla Game theory.

Frank



To: Sir Francis Drake who wrote (21547)4/25/1999 3:55:00 AM
From: EepOpp  Respond to of 74651
 
****OT***Intel-related*****

there is an article on Intel in the May 3rd issue of Forbes. Basically it says that the company knows it is at a transition stage and it is trying very hard to catch the next big thing. Whether or not it can pull it off is the question. But the last paragraph of the story is what i really like. Here's the link:

forbes.com