SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Microcap & Penny Stocks : ABFG - AMERICAN BENEFITS GROUP, INC. -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Spamboy who wrote (2640)4/24/1999 10:17:00 PM
From: TideGlider  Respond to of 4128
 
Do you have any idea what you are reading or replying to? That was a very lame post. I of course am replying to the correct one.

TG



To: Spamboy who wrote (2640)4/25/1999 2:19:00 AM
From: Jeffrey S. Mitchell  Respond to of 4128
 
Kowboy, I think we have a little unfinished business here. You just posted:

Mr Sklar was never brought on board on those companies and severed ties with peoples dealings with the compnaies he was talking with, that is it, the other guys were crooked.

Which other guys are you claiming were "crooked"?

====

Fenways Directors...

1) John Wilson, Coquitlam, British Columbia
2) Leonard Taylor, Gibsons, BC
3) Laurie Miranda, Richmond, BC
4) George Muscroft, Surrey, BC
5) Rene E. Cristobal, Makati City, Phillippines
6) Milton Schlesinger, Whitestone, New York, USA

Trump's Directors...

1) David Sidhu, New New Westminster, BC
2) Geoff Armstrong, Vancouver, BC
3) Parmjit Singh, Surrey, BC

#reply-9124392

=====

As you are also alleging that Brent Mudry of Stockwatch was lying about Gerald Sklar's involvement with Trump and Fenway, I have passed on your post to him and will post his response.

BTW, I see you must have been sick when they taught reading comprehension is school. Mr. Mudry clearly states in his opening paragraph that Sklar was not a director of either company nor named in the freeze order: "The two promoters were not named in the BC Securities Commission's temporary freeze order on the proposed takeover on Friday, but their ties with Trump are timely." The whole point of the story was to show Sklar's involvement despite that being the case. Now, ask yourself why Sklar was hiding behind the scenes instead of running the show? After all, in July of '97 he actually was a director of Trump (see #reply-9111831).

I must say, I never really considered the fact that the BCSC actually may have brought any action against Sklar in the Trump/Fenway deal. Trump was an American company and didn't trade on the BCSC so I can't see how they'd even have had any jurisdiction in the matter. Nevertheless, I'll see what I can find out.

~~~~~~~~

Now, let's move on to situations in which the BCSC does have jurisdiction. This was question 13 on my list and posted numerous times to you. Why you've chosen to ignore it only you know. I suggest if you really want to know the "truth" you not tarry further.

13. An individual under the alias "Kowboy" appears to have doubts Mr. Gerald Sklar has ever been found guilty of a securities violation. Could you please set the record straight?

For example, on 9/19/89, Intercontinental Ventures Ltd issued a press release entitled "Securities commission releases Sklar decision" This press release very clearly states that "Mr D. M. Thompson of the BC securities commission reports the BC securities commission has released its decision in the matter of Gerald Emile Sklar. Sklar was a director and officer of Intercontinental and Max Minerals."

"... the commission found the news releases to be false and misleading. Since Sklar had directed their release without taking adequate precautions to ensure they were true, the commission determined that he did not exercise the care, diligence and skill of a reasonably prudent person. Later, after he knew the information was false, he failed to act honestly..."

Upon being found guilty: "The commission found Sklar's behaviour to be prejudicial to the public interest and ordered the removal of his trading exemptions for three years. Sklar is also prohibited from acting as a director or officer of a public company for three years and will be required to pay costs of the hearing.

Source: wwwf.canada-stockwatch.com.

~~~~~

Time to saddle up my friend!

- Jeff