To: Ahda who wrote (5543 ) 4/25/1999 1:18:00 PM From: Hawkmoon Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 81737
Ron i find value in your posts. Thank you very much, Darleen. And I DO appreciate your opinions as well. As for the efficacy of GATA and their claims, it is just as easy to argue the other side of manipulation, that of years worth of gold supply being removed from the physical markets and distorting the POG. Imagine if nations held large quantities of oil (like 14 years worth of supply) in reserve. Would the price of oil rise or fall?? Given that the US and most other developed nations retain 40-60 days supply of oil, there have been various complaints from the oil sector as to how this distorts the market for oil by placing a price lid on it price, and furthermore that the Gov't has no place storing that much oil. Now in the case of gold, we can argue two different cases. If gold demand is higher than annual production, and CB's are unwilling to sell their gold reserves to meet that demand due to pressure from gold producers/holders, that distorts the market for those who use gold for industrial purposes or jewelry. Personally, I say sell all the gold that CBs hold and if and when there is a future financial crisis, that gold will be held by more small investors who can afford to own larger quantities of it. That's my inherent argument with GATA. While they claim they have been shorting against the precious metal, in fact, the CBs have been deliberately involved in supporting the market and preventing its total collapse. They have been letting it decline gradually ever since the peak in 1982. And that is distortionary and just as worthy of legal action as anything that GATA is trying to arrange. Take care, and enjoy the rest of your weekend. Regards, Ron