Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Kosovo -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: GUSTAVE JAEGER who wrote (5434)	4/27/1999 5:53:00 PM
From: goldsnow	Respond to of 17770

CORRECTED-ANALYSIS-NATO effectively scraps ban on Russian oil 09:32 a.m. Apr 27, 1999 Eastern By Sebastian Alison MOSCOW, April 27 (Reuters) - NATO has effectively scrapped its attempt to impose an embargo on Russian crude oil and oil products entering Yugoslavia in the face of fierce Russian protests, analysts said on Tuesday. But while the Russian government insists NATO has no right to impose a ban, analysts say it may well be in the commercial interests of Russian oil companies to respect the embargo and keep their products out of Serbia. NATO imposed an oil embargo on its members on Friday, hours after the European Union did the same. It also made clear that it would try to extend the embargo to other countries, including Russia, the largest single oil supplier to Serbia last year. Russian Foreign Minister Igor Ivanov on Tuesday repeated his rejection of such a ban. ''Only the U.N. Security Council can take a decision which binds all states in the form of any sanctions or embargoes, and the decisions taken by NATO or the European Union and for that matter by any regional organisation are valid only for their members,'' he told a news briefing. ''Consequently these decisions have no legal binding force on Russia.'' Ivanov met U.S. Deputy Secretary of State Strobe Talbott in Moscow on Tuesday, but Talbott declined to answer any questions on the oil issue. NATO has already started backtracking. General Klaus Naumann, who commands NATO's Military Committee, said on Monday that NATO had no authority to use force to stop oil shipments to Yugoslavia. Canadian Defence Minister Art Eggleton said later on Monday that NATO had no intention of mounting a naval blockade against Russian oil shipments to Yugoslavia. Analysts said the Western alliance would want to tread carefully where Russia was concerned. ''It's not an effective embargo. There's a desire to be very sensitive to Russia and not to stop and turn back Russian ships,'' said Stephen O'Sullivan, head of research at United Financial Group in Moscow. ''There's also a desire to keep Russia onside as well,'' he added, pointing out that NATO sees Russia as having a vital role to play in any peace settlement over Kosovo. Ruslan Nickolov, analyst at Nomura Securities, agreed NATO had effectively exempted Russia from the embargo. ''It looks like that to me. Perhaps (NATO has decided) this is not the most essential element in the campaign, and it's probably not worth risking further confrontation,'' he said. But O'Sullivan said that while the Russian government has said oil deliveries to Yugoslavia would carry on under existing contractual terms, individual Russian companies would probably be extremely sensitive to NATO's position. ''There's a commercial pressure rather than a political pressure for Russian companies not to tangle with NATO,'' he said. Russian companies such as LUKoil (LKOH.RTS), the country's largest, are looking to expand in central and eastern Europe, he said, adding that it would be keen to maintain good relations with potential lenders, most of whom are NATO or EU members. ''They're not going to break the embargo if it means access to capital markets is restricted in 18 months' time,'' he said. Instead, he said, Serbia was likely to import most of its oil products -- crude oil is of no use to Serbia as its refineries have been destroyed -- through Romania and Bulgaria, even though those governments are committed to the embargo. ''Individuals in those countries are entrepreneurs and there are large profits to be made. It's only natural for a black market to develop,'' O'Sullivan said. Although Russia was the largest single oil supplier to Yugoslavia last year, the amounts it supplied were tiny -- around 12,000 barrels per day of crude and around 2,000 barrels per day of fuel oil. Russia is the third largest oil producer in the world, and exports of oil typically account for around half of all Russian hard currency export earnings. Copyright 1999 Reuters Limited.

To: GUSTAVE JAEGER who wrote (5434)	4/27/1999 5:55:00 PM
From: goldsnow	Respond to of 17770

Now this is just simply laughable .. This embargo is laughable look at this..:) NATO force won't cut Bosnia Serb oil deliveries 10:53 a.m. Apr 27, 1999 Eastern SARAJEVO, April 27 (Reuters) - The NATO-led peace force in Bosnia on Tuesday said it was not planning action to stop any oil deliveries going via Bosnia's Serb half to neighbouring Yugoslavia, despite a NATO oil embargo. A spokesman for the NATO Stabilisation Force (SFOR) stressed that no major amounts of oil were being shipped to Yugoslavia from Bosnia. Spokesman Dave Scanlon also said any steps to halt oil shipments would only be undertaken under SFOR's mandate to protect Bosnia's peace process. ''We are not concerned that there are significant amounts of oil crossing the border to FRY (Federal Republic of Yugoslavia) from Bosnia which are being used as war material,'' he told reporters. ''Our concern is in the area of war materials being transported throughout Bosnia, being exported or imported without authorisation,'' he added. Scanlon and a spokeswoman for the Western body overseeing civilian aspects of the Bosnian peace process also said a pipeline in Croatia supplying an oil refinery in Bosnia's Serb republic should remain open. They said SFOR and the Office of the High Representative (OHR) had received assurances from authorities in Bosnia's Serb territory that oil going to the northern Bosanski Brod refinery would be used only for domestic purposes. ''We see no problem in the continuation of this pipeline down to Bosnia,'' Scanlon said. ''We support the position that the pipeline should be open.'' OHR spokeswoman Alexandra Stiglmayer said Croatia's foreign ministry had asked it whether it should close the pipeline because of NATO's embargo, imposed on April 25. ''We said the shipments should go ahead,'' she said. The Sava river town of Bosanski Brod lies some 200 kilometres (125 miles) north of Sarajevo. SFOR safeguards peace in post-war Bosnia, which comprises the Serb republic and the Moslem-Croat federation, with some 32,000 ground troops. It insists that it plays no role in the NATO campaign on Yugoslavia. General Klaus Naumann, who commands NATO's Military Committee, said on Monday that NATO had no authority to use force to stop oil shipments to Yugoslavia. ((Nedim Dervisbegovic, Sarajevo newsroom, +387 71 663 864, +387 71 445 727)) Copyright 1999 Reuters Limited