To: whisky who wrote (1204 ) 4/26/1999 4:01:00 PM From: Claude Cormier Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 2402
<,As far as connected goes, I wouldn't say that, I just phone and ask specific questions, something I recommend every one does to find out exactly what is going on. >. Of course, I do that regularly. It helps to understand who are the people managing the companies you invest in. But you rarely get new fundamental data in these discussions. What is in print is what counts. <<I have to question your motives for your recent comments on SWG's price in relation to CNB, as I'm sure others are to. Claude, just for the sake of asking, are you a broker, trader or just a lowly investor like myself. Answers to all my questions would be appreciated. Remember no lies now, just the truth. >>. Of course. I can answer. But I don't think that I've said things that could indicate I have any motive of any sort. I've been discussing on two companies, SWG and its subsidiary CNB, and trying to explain why I prefer SWG to CNB. Also said that I could understand why others would prefer CNB. The reason I prefer SWG are also the reasons I own SUF. I am simply of the more conservative brand. As for who I am, well I am afraid that if I tell you, you will automatically conclude that I have a motive, which is not the case. Let say that I am no broker, nor trader (I do trade base on technical analysis, but only the seniors). I invest in juniors base on fundamentals and I prefer the juniors that have a mix of defined and undefined (in terms of reserves) assets rather than those who are at the early stage of looking for reserves and have yet to define something that can be mined for several years at a profit. Once the update you are talking about is out, I may well be the first to upgrade CNB, at least on my evaluation scale. CC