Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Newbridge Networks -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: cruncher who wrote (11002)	4/26/1999 9:49:00 PM
From: Glenn McDougall	Respond to of 18016

After Fore, There Are Slim Pickings in Networkers By Kevin Petrie Staff Reporter thestreet.com Now it's just table scraps. London-based conglomerate General Electric Company joined the bandwagon of European telecommunications companies raiding U.S. data networkers Monday when it swooped down to grab Fore Systems (FORE:Nasdaq) for around $4 billion cash -- 79 times its earnings for its fiscal year ending in March. The buyout by GEC, which isn't related to General Electric (GE:NYSE) of the U.S., closes an important chapter the consolidation of this industry. While networking king Cisco (CSCO:Nasdaq) and telecom giants such as Lucent (LU:NYSE) and Ericsson (ERICY:Nasdaq ADR) will continue to forage for network hardware, they will not find viable switch or router companies on the public market. Those networkers have mostly been acquired. "At this point, all the consolidation that's been talked about has happened," says analyst Martin Pyykkonen with CIBC Oppenheimer. Pyykkonen started covering six companies with Oppenheimer in early 1998; three have been acquired. Nortel (NT:NYSE) snapped up Bay Networks in late summer; Lucent will close its merger with Ascend (ASND:Nasdaq) by late June. Today, Fore agreed to be acquired. After nearly doubling in five weeks amid expectations of a takeover, Fore gained 38% Monday to finish at 33 3/4 -- close to its $35 a share cash value fixed by the deal. 3Com (COMS:Nasdaq) tacked on 3/4 to 26 9/16, and Cabletron (CS:NYSE) jumped 1 5/16 to 9 1/2. Fore had "scarcity value," Pyykkonen says, because it deals almost purely in a network technology called "asynchronous transfer mode," or ATM. Although Fore struggled in competing with Cisco for corporate accounts, its ATM switches will enable carriers to blend voice and data calls on their networks. With Fore gone, there is a dearth of companies offering refined ATM systems -- technology it would benefit Tellabs (TLAB:Nasdaq) and Ericsson to acquire as they prepare their product lines for future networks. Acquirers might find ATM switches more easily among networking start-ups -- provided they can convince them not to go public. Among the remaining publicly-traded companies, 3Com and Cabletron do not specialize in ATM. Newbridge (NN:NYSE), an ATM supplier based in Kanata, Ontario, has ATM switches, but like 3Com, it has some less attractive product lines and is large enough to be an unwieldy partner. Cabletron, meanwhile, has lost market share to Cisco. Rumors have circulated on Wall Street that either Ericsson or Siemens might buy the Santa Clara, Calif.-based 3Com for its switches and Internet access gear, but it's hardly a simple proposition because 3Com relies so heavily on modems and PC-adapter cards, which have razor-thin profit margins. Much of the takeover talk, which resurfaced Friday, involves carving up the company into separate business units. 3Com is valued at $9.6 billion, or 26 times profits in the last four quarters, and is expected to grow earnings 17% in the fiscal year ending May 2000. Meanwhile, Wall Street scrounges for leftovers. Cabletron remains the subject of tireless merger speculation. "There's always the old standby," says one institutional trader. Although the Rochester, N.H.-based Cabletron streamlined operations and squeezed out a profit last quarter, during the fiscal year ended February, net loss nearly doubled to $240 million. Cabletron is expected to earn 36 cents in the fiscal year ending February 2000, compared to a net loss of 1.43 per share in fiscal 1999. Newbridge is saddled with slowing sales of a dying technology called "time division multiplexing," or TDM. Newbridge trades at $6.8 billion, or 42 times earnings. Newbridge has disappointed repeatedly, but is expected to recover and grow earnings 53% in the year ending April 2000. But few investors have confidence that these three can prove to be of value to a buyer.

To: cruncher who wrote (11002)	4/26/1999 9:50:00 PM
From: Glenn McDougall	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 18016

<<After Fore, There Are Slim Pickings in Networkers By Kevin Petrie Staff Reporter thestreet.com Now it's just table scraps.>> BULL Glenn

To: cruncher who wrote (11002)	4/27/1999 12:12:00 AM
From: pat mudge	Respond to of 18016

Cruncher -- Take-out rumors are natural when you consider how many LU-type integrators need carrier-grade ATM. The speculation is based far more on NN's being needed than on their wanting to be taken out. They have Siemens for global marketing muscle and beyond that, I believe they can survive quite well on their own. I would imagine there'll be many acquisition-related questions when Jim Arsenault, NN's EVP IP and Internetworking Products Group, presents here at the H&Q conference on Wednesday. Later --- Pat